Nick Szabo，比特幣核心V30：合法的雷區？

尼克·薩博（Nick Szabo）打破了對比特幣核心V30的沉默，引發了有關法律風險和區塊鏈膨脹的辯論。升級是向前升級還是潛在的陷阱？

The Bitcoin world's buzzing, and not just about price swings. Bitcoin pioneer Nick Szabo recently emerged from a five-year social media hiatus to drop some serious knowledge on the upcoming Bitcoin Core v30 update. Buckle up, because this ain't your average tech upgrade.

比特幣世界的嗡嗡聲，而不僅僅是價格波動。比特幣先驅尼克·薩博（Nick Szabo）最近從五年的社交媒體中斷出現，以對即將到來的比特幣核心V30更新進行一些認真的了解。扣緊，因為這不是您的平均技術升級。

OP_RETURN: Pandora's Box?

op_return：潘多拉的盒子？

The heart of the matter? The OP_RETURN opcode. This feature lets users embed data within Bitcoin transactions. The update proposes boosting the data limit from a measly 80 bytes to a whopping 4 megabytes. Sounds cool, right? Not so fast.

這件事的心？ OP_RETURN OPCODE。此功能使用戶可以將數據嵌入比特幣交易中。該更新建議將數據限制從80個字節提高到4兆字節。聽起來很酷，對吧？不那麼快。

Bitcoin purists are sweating, worried about blockchain bloat and misuse. They argue Bitcoin should stick to its financial knitting. Maximalists, on the other hand, say paying fees should grant freedom to use block space as desired. It's a classic crypto showdown.

比特幣純粹主義者在出汗，擔心區塊鏈膨脹和濫用。他們認為比特幣應該堅持其財務編織。另一方面，最高者說，支付費用應授予根據需要使用塊空間的自由。這是一個經典的加密攤牌。

Szabo's Legal Concerns: A Red Flag?

Szabo的法律問題：危險信號？

Szabo's return throws a wrench into the works, particularly regarding legal risks. He points out that while transaction fees act as a “spam filter” for miners, they don't shield full node operators from potential legal liability. Imagine running a node and stumbling upon, shall we say, *unsavory* content. Yikes.

Szabo的歸來將扳手帶入了工程中，尤其是關於法律風險。他指出，雖然交易費用是礦工的“垃圾郵件過濾器”，但他們並沒有使完整的節點運營商免受潛在的法律責任。想像一下，運行一個節點並絆倒，我們可以說， *不愉快 *內容。是的。

He raises the question: What happens when full node operators become aware of illegal content on the blockchain? Do they then have knowledge that could make them liable?

他提出了一個問題：當完整的節點操作員意識到區塊鏈上的非法內容時會發生什麼？然後，他們有可能使他們承擔責任的知識嗎？

Szabo acknowledges that OP_RETURN data is “prunable,” potentially reducing legal risks. However, he cautions that illegal content in a standard format could attract unwanted attention from courts and regulators. It's a double-edged sword.

Szabo承認，OP_Return數據是“可靠的”，可能會降低法律風險。但是，他警告說，以標準格式的非法內容可能會引起法院和監管機構的不良關注。這是一把雙刃劍。

Community Divided: Chaos or Progress?

社區分裂：混亂還是進步？

The community's split. Some fear Bitcoin Core v30 could open the door for explicit content and "kill Bitcoin." Others wave it off as mere exaggeration, or even accuse the opposition of using CSAM as a fear, uncertainty and doubt (FUD) tactic.

社區的分裂。一些恐懼的比特幣核心V30可能會為明確的內容和“殺死比特幣”打開大門。其他人則只是誇張，甚至指責使用CSAM作為恐懼，不確定性和懷疑（FUD）策略。

A Personal Take: Walking the Tightrope

個人看法：行走繩索

Here's my two sats: Szabo's concerns are legit. The legal landscape surrounding blockchain tech is still murky, and node operators could inadvertently become targets. However, stifling innovation for fear of hypothetical legal risks isn't the answer either. The key is finding a balance – fostering innovation while implementing safeguards against abuse and potential legal pitfalls.

這是我的兩個SAT：Szabo的擔憂是合法的。圍繞區塊鏈技術的法律景觀仍然模糊，節點操作員可能會無意中成為目標。但是，由於擔心假設法律風險而扼殺創新也不是答案。關鍵是找到平衡 - 在實施防止虐待和潛在的法律陷阱的同時促進創新。

We need clear guidelines and perhaps even legal frameworks that address the unique challenges posed by decentralized technologies. Relying solely on miners and fees might not cut it in the long run.

我們需要明確的準則，甚至可能需要解決分散技術帶來的獨特挑戰的法律框架。從長遠來看，僅依靠礦工和費用可能不會削減。

The Road Ahead: Navigate Carefully

前方的道路：小心翼翼

Bitcoin Core v30 is more than just a tech upgrade; it's a potential legal minefield. Whether it's a step forward or a stumble remains to be seen. One thing's for sure: the conversation's just getting started. And with Szabo back in the mix, things are about to get a whole lot more interesting. So, HODL on tight, folks – it's gonna be a wild ride!

比特幣Core V30不僅僅是技術升級。這是一個潛在的合法雷區。無論是向前邁出的一步還是跌倒仍然有待觀察。可以肯定的是：對話剛剛開始。隨著Szabo的混合，事情將變得更加有趣。因此，霍德（Hodl）緊緊，伙計們 - 這將是一次瘋狂的旅程！