運動實驗室和運動網絡基金會對做市商不當行為進行內部調查

運動實驗室和運動網絡基金會已經對做市商不當行為進行了正式的內部調查

Movement Labs and the Movement Network Foundation have launched a formal internal investigation into market maker misconduct surrounding their native token, MOVE.

運動實驗室和運動網絡基金會已經對圍繞其本土代幣的做市商不當行為進行了正式的內部調查。

The investigation, now underway with support from a third-party review, follows Binance’s recent decision to ban an unnamed market maker associated with MOVE.

這項調查現在在第三方審查的支持下進行，這是Binance最近決定禁止與移動相關的不願透露姓名的做市商的決定。

As BeInCrypto reported, the Binance exchange discovered the market maker had quietly dumped 66 million MOVE tokens worth approximately $38 million following the token’s listing.

正如Beincrypto報導的那樣，二手股交易所發現，在代幣上市之後，做市商已悄悄地傾倒了6600萬個搬遷令牌，價值約3800萬美元。

The fallout triggered a sharp sell-off, pushing MOVE’s price below $0.30, marking new lows for the token.

輻射引發了急劇的拋售，將Move的價格推高低於0.30美元，標誌著令牌的新低點。

According to Blockworks, Movement Labs issued a company-wide Slack communication on Tuesday announcing the investigation.

根據Blockworks的說法，運動實驗室在周二宣布調查週二發布了全公司範圍的溝通。

“We are conducting an internal investigation stemming from recent events. In addition, the Movement Network Foundation has commissioned a third-party firm to conduct an audit and review to investigate this matter further. This is standard best practice to ensure full transparency and accountability,” a spokesperson was quoted as saying.

“我們正在進行來自最近事件的內部調查。此外，運動網絡基金會已委託第三方公司進行審核和審查，以進一步調查此問題。這是確保完全透明度和問責制的標準最佳實踐，”發言人援引發言人的話說。

The spokesperson declined to comment further, adding that they will not speculate on potential outcomes or penalties.

發言人拒絕進一步評論，並補充說他們不會推測潛在的結果或處罰。

The investigation also coincides with Movement co-founder Rushi Manche’s temporary leave of absence, which sources confirmed was announced during an internal all-hands meeting on Monday.

調查還與運動聯合創始人拉什·曼奇（Rushi Manche）的臨時休假相吻合，消息人士在周一的一次全方手會議上宣布了消息人士證實。

While Manche was notably absent from a recent company offsite in San Francisco, he has disputed reports of his departure.

雖然Manche明顯缺席了最近在舊金山的現場公司，但他對他出發的報導提出了異議。

“Very much still at Movement. Missed company offsite because I was in Asia for Web3Festival,” Manche said on X, formerly Twitter, in response to a question about his absence.

Manche在Twitter X上說：“非常不在運動。由於我在亞洲的Web3festival而在亞洲錯過了現場。”

Manche also responded to speculation about his status on Slack, stating that he remains active and participates in weekly ecosystem calls. His Slack profile, which sources said was deactivated late last week, appeared to be reinstated by Monday evening.

Manche還回應了他對Slack身份的猜測，稱他保持活躍並參加每週的生態系統電話。消息人士稱，他的鬆弛個人資料上週下旬被停用了，似乎在星期一晚上恢復了。

Despite the confusion, co-founder Cooper Scanlon continues to lead operational matters, assuring employees and the community that operations are normal.

儘管感到困惑，但聯合創始人庫珀·斯坎倫（Cooper Scanlon）仍繼續領導運營事務，確保員工和社區的運營是正常的。

As the third-party investigation unfolds and MOVE’s price continues to bleed, Movement Labs faces a crossroads.

隨著第三方調查的展開，Move的價格繼續流血，運動實驗室將面臨十字路口。

The investigation may help rebuild confidence, but questions remain about internal controls, liquidity partner vetting, and the future of the MOVE ecosystem.

調查可能有助於重建信心，但有關內部控制，流動性合作夥伴審查以及移動生態系統的未來的問題仍然存在。

Binance ban and Web3Port ties

Binance Ban和Web3Port關係

It is worth noting that Binance did not disclose the name of the banned market maker. However, on-chain investigator ZachXBT pointed out possible ties to Web3Port. The firm had previously interacted with Movement Labs’ social media and community channels.

值得注意的是，Binance沒有透露被禁止的做市商的名稱。但是，鍊鍊研究者Zachxbt指出了與Web3Port的可能聯繫。該公司以前曾與運動實驗室的社交媒體和社區渠道進行互動。

This case adds to a growing list of questionable practices involving market makers in crypto, raising concerns about insider privileges, token dumping, and undisclosed conflicts of interest.

此案增加了越來越多的可疑實踐清單，這些做法涉及加密貨幣的做市商，引起了對內幕特權，代幣傾銷以及未公開的利益衝突的擔憂。

As BeInCrypto previously analyzed, market makers have been a source of chaos in the crypto markets. The lack of transparency and regulatory oversight allows some market makers to exploit their roles, often at the expense of retail investors.

正如Beincrypto先前所分析的那樣，做市商一直是加密市場中混亂的來源。缺乏透明度和監管監督使一些做市商可以利用其角色，通常是以零售投資者為代價。

In addition to the MOVE incident, Binance recently banned other market makers over misconduct related to GPS and SHELL tokens. As it happened, one entity behind those abuses allegedly operated using shell companies, masking its involvement in multiple suspicious listings. This may indicate how widespread the issue is.

除了舉動事件外，Binance最近還禁止其他做市商與GPS和Shell令牌有關的不當行為。碰巧的是，據稱是使用殼牌公司操作的濫用行為背後的一個實體，掩蓋了其參與多個可疑列表。這可能表明問題有多普遍。