Hyperliquid的炒作提供：削減其餘部分？

Hyperliquid的本地令牌Hype是重新定義其令牌學的提案的中心。潛在的45％供應量可能是改變遊戲規則的人。

Hyperliquid's HYPE Offer: A Cut Above the Rest?

Hyperliquid的炒作提供：削減其餘部分？

The buzz around Hyperliquid's HYPE token is getting louder, with a proposal on the table to potentially slash its total supply by a whopping 45%. Is this a strategic move or a radical overhaul? Let's dive in.

圍繞超流動性炒作令牌的嗡嗡聲越來越大，桌子上提議將其總供應量降低了45％。這是戰略舉動還是激進的大修？讓我們潛水。

The Proposal: Less HYPE, More Value?

提案：更少的炒作，更多的價值？

Spearheaded by Jon Charbonneau and Hasu, the proposal aims to address concerns that the current HYPE supply distorts valuation metrics. The core idea? Eliminate over 450 million tokens earmarked for Future Emissions and Community Rewards (FECR) and the Assistance Fund (AF). The reasoning is that this reserve creates negative expectations, penalizing the token's perceived value.

該提案由喬恩·夏邦諾（Jon Charbonneau）和哈蘇（Hasu）率領，旨在解決當前炒作供應扭曲估值指標的擔憂。核心想法？淘汰了超過4.5億個代幣，用於未來的排放和社區獎勵（FECR）和援助基金（AF）。原因是該儲備會產生負面期望，從而懲罰令牌的感知價值。

Think of it like this: imagine a pizza with a massive slice reserved for later. Sure, it's technically there, but it might not taste as good tomorrow. Charbonneau and Hasu believe burning those unused tokens cleans up the balance sheet and allows for more efficient capital allocation.

這樣想：想像一下一個披薩，其中保留了大量切片。當然，從技術上講，它可能不會那麼明天味道。 Charbonneau和Hasu認為燃燒那些未使用的令牌可以清理資產負債表，並可以進行更有效的資本分配。

The Great Supply Debate: Bitcoin's Shadow

供應辯論：比特幣的影子

Another eyebrow-raising aspect? The proposal suggests ditching the fixed one billion HYPE limit. The argument is that this limit, inspired by Bitcoin, doesn't quite fit the dynamic nature of blockchains like Ethereum and Solana. According to the proposal, the community should have the option to adjust issuance policies based on value-accretive opportunities down the line.

另一個眉毛的方面？該提案表明拋棄固定的十億次炒作限制。論點是，受比特幣啟發的限制並不完全符合以太坊和索拉納等區塊鏈的動態性質。根據該提案，社區應該可以選擇根據基於價值的機會調整髮行政策。

Aster's Ascent: A DEX Duel

Aster的上升：Dex對決

While Hyperliquid contemplates its HYPE strategy, it's worth noting the shifting landscape in the decentralized exchange (DEX) arena. Aster recently surpassed Hyperliquid in daily trading volume, fueled by praise from Binance founder Changpeng Zhao and innovative features like hidden orders. Though Hyperliquid's weekly volume still leads, Aster's surge highlights the intense competition and the constant need for DEX platforms to innovate and adapt.

雖然超流動性考慮其炒作策略，但值得注意的是，分散交易所（DEX）競技場中的變化景觀。阿特（Aster）最近在日常交易量中超越了超級流動量，這在Binance創始人Changpeng Zhao的讚美和創新功能（如隱藏訂單）的推動下。儘管Hyperliquid的每週卷仍在導致，但Aster的激增突出了激烈的競爭，並且不斷需要DEX平台進行創新和適應。

My Two Satoshis

我的兩個satoshis

The HYPE proposal is a bold move, no doubt. Cutting the supply could indeed boost the token's perceived value, but it also raises questions about long-term community rewards and potential future needs. The argument against a fixed supply cap is interesting, suggesting a more flexible approach to tokenomics. Ultimately, it will depend on the Hyperliquid community to determine the best path forward. From my point of view, it's a necessary step, much like when I had to cut my bangs after a bad hair day—sometimes you just gotta do it for the greater good!

毫無疑問，炒作提案是一個大膽的舉動。減少供應確實可以提高令牌的感知價值，但也引發了有關長期社區獎勵和潛在未來需求的疑問。針對固定供應上限的論點很有趣，這表明對令牌學的方法更靈活。最終，這將取決於超流動社區以確定前進的最佳途徑。從我的角度來看，這是一個必要的步驟，就像我在糟糕的一天后不得不割劉海的時候一樣 - 有時您就必須為更大的好處做到這一點！

The Road Ahead

前面的道路

The proposal is still under discussion, and the Hyperliquid community is actively engaged in shaping the future of HYPE. Whether they decide to cut, burn, or tweak, one thing is clear: the HYPE story is far from over. So, stay tuned, grab some popcorn, and watch the drama unfold. After all, isn't crypto always a little bit like a reality TV show?

該提案仍在討論中，超流動社區正在積極參與塑造炒作的未來。無論他們決定削減，燃燒還是調整，一件事都很清楚：炒作故事還遠遠沒有結束。因此，請繼續關注，抓住一些爆米花，觀看戲劇的展開。畢竟，加密貨幣是否總是有點像真人秀電視節目？