Griffin AI的獲得代幣在剝削之後下降了80％：一個偽造令牌和加密安全性的警告性故事

格里芬·AI（Griffin AI）的收益代幣墜毀後，在安全性漏洞中允許攻擊者鑄造並拋棄數十億個假代幣。該事件強調了加密空間中的風險。

In a dramatic turn of events, Griffin AI's GAIN token, once hailed as a promising blend of AI and DeFi, experienced a devastating crash. After a bullish debut on major exchanges, a security exploit led to the minting of billions of fake tokens, triggering an 80% price plunge. Here's the lowdown.

在一次戲劇性的事件中，格里芬·艾（Griffin AI）的獲得代幣曾經被稱為AI和Defi的有希望的融合，經歷了毀滅性的崩潰。在對重大交易所的看漲首次亮相後，安全性的利用導致了數十億個假代幣的鑄造，引發了80％的價格下跌。這是低點。

From Bullish Beginnings to Sudden Collapse

從看漲開始到突然崩潰

Just a day before the exploit, GAIN was riding high with listings on Binance, KuCoin, and Gate.io. Griffin AI touted GAIN as the utility token for its AI-powered DeFi platform, offering premium agents and advanced trading features. However, this triumph was short-lived.

就在漏洞利用的前一天，Gain在Binance，Kucoin和Gate.io上列出了高處。 Griffin AI吹捧為其AI驅動的Defi平台的實用程序，提供了高級代理和高級交易功能。但是，這種勝利是短暫的。

The Exploit: A Nightmare Scenario

利用：噩夢場景

Blockchain security firm CertiK reported that an attacker exploited a LayerZero vulnerability, creating a false peer on Ethereum. This allowed them to mint a staggering 5 billion fake GAIN tokens. These tokens were then bridged to Binance Smart Chain, converted into genuine GAIN, and dumped into the market. The attacker reportedly made around $3 million before laundering the funds through Tornado Cash.

區塊鏈安全公司Certik報告說，攻擊者利用了層的漏洞，在以太坊上創建了一個錯誤的對等。這使他們能夠造成驚人的50億個假收益令牌。然後將這些令牌橋接成二手智能鏈，轉化為真正的收益，並傾倒到市場上。據報導，襲擊者賺了大約300萬美元，然後通過龍捲風現金洗錢。

Market Fallout: A Supply Shock

市場後果：供應衝擊

The exploit's impact was immediate and brutal. The attacker's creation of 5 billion tokens, compared to the original 235 million, caused a massive supply shock, diluting the token's value. Panic selling ensued, with trading volume skyrocketing and prices plummeting.

漏洞的影響是直接和殘酷的。與最初的2.35億相比，攻擊者創造了50億個令牌，引起了巨大的供應衝擊，從而稀釋了令牌的價值。隨之而來的恐慌銷售隨之而來，交易量飆升，價格下降。

The Illusion of Exchange Listings

交換清單的幻想

While exchange listings are generally seen as positive catalysts, in this case, they inadvertently aided the attacker. The new liquidity facilitated a quicker and more damaging dump, highlighting that listings alone cannot guarantee a token's success if fundamental security is lacking.

儘管交換清單通常被視為積極的催化劑，但在這種情況下，它們無意間幫助了攻擊者。新的流動性促進了一個更快，更具破壞性的轉儲，強調僅列表就不能保證如果缺乏基本安全性，則無法保證代幣的成功。

Broader Concerns: Security is Paramount

更廣泛的問題：安全是至關重要的

The Griffin AI incident underscores a critical lesson in the crypto world: security vulnerabilities can bring even the most promising projects to their knees. It raises questions about the project's ability to recover and the long-term viability of GAIN as a utility token.

格里芬AI事件強調了加密貨幣世界中的關鍵教訓：安全漏洞甚至可以將最有前途的項目帶到膝蓋上。它提出了有關該項目恢復能力以及收益作為實用程序代幣的長期生存能力的疑問。

What's Next for Griffin AI?

格里芬AI的下一步是什麼？

The community is now waiting for an official recovery plan from the Griffin AI team. Key questions remain: Can they freeze the attacker's wallet or implement a buyback program? The team's response will be crucial in determining whether trust can be restored.

社區現在正在等待格里芬AI團隊的正式恢復計劃。關鍵問題仍然存在：他們可以凍結攻擊者的錢包還是實施回購計劃？團隊的回應對於確定是否可以恢復信任至關重要。

A Humorous Takeaway

幽默的外賣

So, what have we learned? In the wild west of crypto, even AI-powered projects aren't immune to good ol' fashioned exploits. It's a reminder that security is not just important; it's the foundation upon which everything else is built. Keep your tokens close, your bridges audited, and remember, if something seems too GAIN-tastic to be true, it probably is!

那麼，我們學到了什麼？在Crypto的野外，即使是AI驅動的項目也無法不受良好的時裝漏洞的影響。提醒您的安全不僅很重要。這是其他一切都建立的基礎。保持令牌的近距離，審核橋樑，並記住，如果某種東西似乎太好事了，以至於不可能是真實的！