X帝國空投與NFT分配問題：基於CPH的分配問題與公平性問題

表明您的 $X 代幣已作為 NFT 分發的通知引起了人們對分發過程的擔憂。儘管鑄造了兩個 NFT 並且擁有高達 17 億的 CPH（後來增加到 157 億），但您的代幣分配似乎低於預期。

The notification indicating that your $X tokens were distributed as NFTs raises concerns about the process.

表明您的 $X 代幣已作為 NFT 分發的通知引起了人們對該過程的擔憂。

Despite minting two NFTs and having a high CPH of 1.7 billion (later increasing to 15.7 billion), your token allocation seems lower than expected.

儘管鑄造了兩個 NFT 並且擁有高達 17 億的 CPH（後來增加到 157 億），但您的代幣分配似乎低於預期。

Even though there were no transactions, your initial CPH was significant, yet you received a limited number of NFTs. During the Chill Phase, despite maintaining a CPH of 1.7 billion, there was no visible NFT distribution, raising questions about missing tokens or NFTs that should have been allocated.

即使沒有交易，您的初始 CPH 也很大，但您收到的 NFT 數量有限。在 Chill 階段，儘管 CPH 保持在 17 億，但沒有明顯的 NFT 分配，引發了關於缺少代幣或本應分配的 NFT 的問題。

Significant discrepancies arise when comparing your allocation with other players who have lower CPH values (e.g., 800 million) but received substantial $X token amounts without any TON transactions. This indicates that factors beyond CPH might have influenced the distribution, possibly involving specific criteria or manual adjustments by the team.

將您的分配與具有較低 CPH 值（例如 8 億）但在沒有任何 TON 交易的情況下收到大量 X 美元代幣金額的其他玩家進行比較時，會出現顯著差異。這表明 CPH 以外的因素可能會影響分佈，可能涉及特定標準或團隊的手動調整。

The variation in token rewards among users with different activity levels and CPH suggests a potential lack of transparency in the allocation method. The current model may favor certain behaviors or conditions, raising questions about the overall fairness of the distribution process.

不同活動等級和 CPH 的用戶之間代幣獎勵的差異表明分配方法可能缺乏透明度。目前的模型可能有利於某些行為或條件，引發對分配過程整體公平性的質疑。

Recommendations

建議

Clarification Request: Contact X-Empire's support or community managers to seek clarification on the criteria for $X token allocation.

澄清請求：聯絡 X-Empire 的支援或社群經理，尋求有關 $X 代幣分配標準的澄清。

Community Feedback: Engage with other players to share experiences, as collective feedback may encourage the team to address these issues more thoroughly.

社群回饋：與其他玩家交流經驗，因為集體回饋可能會鼓勵團隊更徹底解決這些問題。

Evaluate Future Participation: Based on the team's response and the perceived fairness of the allocation method, assess whether continuing participation in X-Empire is worthwhile, especially if the distribution process remains unclear.

評估未來的參與：根據團隊的回應和分配方法的公平性，評估繼續參與X帝國是否值得，特別是在分配過程仍不清楚的情況下。

Conclusion The inconsistencies in the token allocation process and potential unfairness could affect player confidence in X-Empire's ecosystem. Your concerns are valid, considering your significant activity and investment in the game.

結論 代幣分配過程的不一致和潛在的不公平可能會影響玩家對 X-Empire 生態系統的信心。考慮到您在遊戲中的重要活動和投資，您的擔憂是有道理的。