國會歡迎SC關於WAQF（修正案）法案的初步觀察

工會政府向最高法院保證它將不會執行《 WAQF（修正案）法》的關鍵規定

Hours after the Union government gave assurance to the Supreme Court that it will not implement key provisions of the Waqf (Amendment) Act till the next hearing, the Congress on Thursday welcomed the top court’s preliminary observations, saying they have opened the space for a broader and necessary debate on the legitimate concerns surrounding “this hastily enacted legislation”.

工會政府向最高法院保證，直到下一次聽證會直到下一次聽證會，它將不會實施《 WAQF（修正案）法案》的關鍵規定，國會周四歡迎最高法院的初步觀察，稱他們為“這一急速納稅立法”的合法問題為更廣泛而必要的辯論打開了空間。

Congress leader Abhishek Singhvi, who addressed a press conference along with party lawmaker Imran Pratapgarhi, said the top court has re-established the “earlier legal position” on three points of the Act.

國會領導人阿比舍克·辛格維（Abhishek Singhvi）與黨議員伊姆蘭·普拉塔普加里（Imran Pratapgarhi）一起在新聞發布會上講話，他說，最高法院已重新建立了該法案三分的“較早的法律立場”。

“The principal points we made in the Supreme Court is that it is not about improving institutions but about controlling them and closing them. The government can’t amputate Article 26 (of Constitution) and call it administrative efficiency,” Singhvi, who is also a senior advocate, said.

“我們在最高法院提出的要點是，這不是要改善機構，而是要控制機構並關閉它們。政府不能截肢（憲法）第26條，並稱其為行政效率，”也是高級倡導者的辛格維（Singhvi）說。

Article 26 guarantees the freedom to manage religious affairs.

第26條保證了管理宗教事務的自由。

Singhvi maintained that a Waqf board with token Muslim representation is another word for appropriation. “It is about a message that minority interests are far game for takeover. The law is against established principles of law,” the Rajya Sabha member said.

辛格維（Singhvi）堅持認為，具有像徵性穆斯林代表的WAQF董事會是撥款的另一個詞。 Rajya Sabha成員說：“這是一個信息，即少數群體的利益是遠遠無法接管的。

Claiming that the party was not defending any one community but the constitutional principle that rights provided under Article 26 cannot be sacrificed. “Today it is Waqf, tomorrow it could be your shrine your institution. No freedom is safe, no institution is sacred. The fight is not just against a law but it’s a fight against an ideology. SC has passed an interim order an important step in restoring the order,” Singhvi added.

聲稱該黨沒有捍衛任何一個社區，而是不能犧牲第26條規定的權利的憲法原則。 “今天是WAQF，明天可能是您的機構。沒有自由是安全的，沒有機構是神聖的。這場鬥爭不僅是違反法律，而且是與意識形態的鬥爭。SC已通過了臨時命令，在恢復命令方面是重要的一步，” Singhvi補充說。

Congress general secretary KC Venugopal said the top court’s observations on the Waqf Act have brought into sharp focus the “very apprehensions” raised by the INDIA bloc parties inside and outside Parliament. “They have opened the space for a broader and necessary debate on the legitimate concerns surrounding this hastily enacted legislation — concerns that were neither adequately addressed during the JPC deliberations nor after the day-long discussion in Parliament,” Venugopal said in a post on X.

國會秘書長KC Venugopal表示，最高法院對《 WAQF法》的觀察已引起了印度集團內部和國會外部的“非常擔心”的重點。 Venugopal在X上的一篇文章中說：“他們為圍繞這項急速制定的立法的合法問題開闢了一個更廣泛而必要的辯論的空間，這在JPC審議期間既沒有充分解決的問題，也沒有在議會進行了為期一天的討論之後。”

“The Court’s pointed remarks raise serious constitutional questions about the Act’s infringement on fundamental rights and lay bare its divisive undercurrents. The fight to defend the idea of India — inclusive, plural, and just — will continue, in the courts and with the people,” he added.

他補充說：“法院的尖銳言論提出了有關該法案侵犯基本權利的嚴重憲法問題，並揭露了其分裂性的暗流。捍衛印度思想的鬥爭 - 包容性，複數和正當的鬥爭 - 將繼續在法院和人民中繼續存在。”