![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
ChatGPT: Unveiling the Post-Exploitation Risks and Mitigation Strategies
The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into our daily routines has brought forth a paradigm shift in how we interact with technology. However, with the advent of powerful language models like ChatGPT, security researchers are actively scrutinizing the potential implications and vulnerabilities that arise from their usage. In this comprehensive analysis, we delving deeper into the post-exploitation risks associated with ChatGPT, shedding light on the techniques attackers could employ to gain persistent access to user data and manipulate application behavior.
The Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) Vulnerability
In a previous investigation, our team uncovered two Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in ChatGPT. These vulnerabilities allowed a malicious actor to exploit the /api/auth/session endpoint, exfiltrating the user's JWT access token and gaining unauthorized access to their account. While the limited validity period of the access token mitigates the risk of permanent account compromise, it underscores the need for robust security measures to prevent such attacks in the first place.
Persistent Access through Custom Instructions
Custom Instructions in ChatGPT offer users the ability to set persistent contexts for customized conversations. However, this feature could pose security risks, including Stored Prompt Injection. Attackers could leverage XSS vulnerabilities or manipulate custom instructions to alter ChatGPT's responses, potentially facilitating misinformation dissemination, phishing, scams, and the theft of sensitive data. Notably, this manipulative influence could persist even after the user's session token has expired, underscoring the threat of long-term, unauthorized access and control.
Recent Mitigations and the Bypass
In response to the identified vulnerabilities, OpenAI has implemented measures to mitigate the risk of prompt injection attacks. The "browser tool" and markdown image rendering are now only permitted when the URL has been previously present in the conversation. This aims to prevent attackers from embedding dynamic, sensitive data within the URL query parameter or path.
However, our testing revealed a bypass technique that allows attackers to circumvent these restrictions. By exploiting the /backend-api/conversation/{uuid}/url_safe?url={url} endpoint, attackers can validate client-side URLs in ChatGPT responses and identify whether a specific string, including custom instructions, is present within the conversation text. This bypass opens up avenues for attackers to continue exfiltrating information despite the implemented mitigations.
Exfiltration Techniques Despite Mitigations
Despite OpenAI's efforts to mitigate information exfiltration, we identified several techniques that attackers could still employ:
Static URLs for Each Character:
Attackers could encode sensitive data into static URLs, creating a unique URL for each character they wish to exfiltrate. By using ChatGPT to generate images for each character and observing the order in which the requests are received, attackers can piece together the data on their server.
One Long Static URL:
Alternatively, attackers could use a single long static URL and ask ChatGPT to create a markdown image up to the character they wish to leak. This approach reduces the number of prompt characters required but may be slower for ChatGPT to render.
Using Domain Patterns:
The fastest method with the least prompt character requirement is using custom top-level domains. However, this method incurs a cost, as each domain would need to be purchased. Attackers could use a custom top-level domain for each character to create distinctive badges that link to the sensitive data.
Other Attack Vectors
Beyond the aforementioned techniques, attackers may also explore the potential for Stored Prompt Injection gadgets within ChatGPTs and the recently introduced ChatGPT memory. These areas could provide additional avenues for exploitation and unauthorized access.
OpenAI's Response and Future Mitigation Strategies
OpenAI is actively working to address the identified vulnerabilities and improve the security of ChatGPT. While the implemented mitigations have made exfiltration more challenging, attackers continue to devise bypass techniques. The ongoing arms race between attackers and defenders highlights the need for continuous monitoring and adaptation of security measures.
Conclusion
The integration of AI into our lives brings forth both opportunities and challenges. While ChatGPT and other language models offer immense potential, it is crucial to remain vigilant of the potential security risks they introduce. By understanding the post-exploitation techniques that attackers could employ, we can develop robust countermeasures and ensure the integrity and security of our systems. As the threat landscape evolves, organizations must prioritize security awareness, adopt best practices, and collaborate with researchers to mitigate the evolving risks associated with AI-powered technologies.
免責聲明:info@kdj.com
所提供的資訊並非交易建議。 kDJ.com對任何基於本文提供的資訊進行的投資不承擔任何責任。加密貨幣波動性較大,建議您充分研究後謹慎投資!
如果您認為本網站使用的內容侵犯了您的版權,請立即聯絡我們(info@kdj.com),我們將及時刪除。
-
-
- 比特幣價格,羅比尼和BTC勢頭:這是怎麼回事?
- 2025-07-01 06:30:11
- 隨著Robinhood隨著令牌化股票的擴展,比特幣徘徊在107,500美元中,這表明了加密貨幣的機構和零售利益的增長。
-
- PNG會員資格飆升以記錄高:深入了解增長及其含義
- 2025-07-01 06:50:11
- PNG成員身份達到了歷史悠久的高度,標誌著該組織和錢幣社區的新時代。是什麼推動了這一增長,為什麼要關心?
-
- 比特幣的突破到$ 110K:紐約有什麼真正的交易?
- 2025-07-01 06:50:11
- 比特幣可以達到$ 110k嗎?我們分解了從通貨膨脹到標準普爾500指數的關鍵因素,並具有紐約的邊緣。
-
-
-
-
- XRP,比特幣及其感知缺陷:2025年的視角
- 2025-07-01 07:15:11
- 看看2025年的XRP和比特幣,研究了它們的優勢,劣勢以及它們如何超越最初的設計。他們仍然是對手還是互補?
-
- 比特幣價格眼睛$ 108K:上升勢頭盛行,寶貝!
- 2025-07-01 07:30:12
- 比特幣的背,寶貝!機構利益和ETF湧入可能的激增至$ 108K及以後。新的歷史最高現象嗎?讓我們深入研究比特幣嗡嗡聲!