區塊鏈嗡嗡聲：Nick Szabo，Bitcoin Core V30和OP_Return Rumble

尼克·薩博（Nick Szabo）的背部，他用比特幣核心V30攪動鍋！獲取OP_Return辯論的低點及其對區塊鏈的未來意味著什麼。

Blockchain, Nick Szabo, Bitcoin Core – these names are lighting up the crypto town square. Szabo's return after a five-year hiatus to weigh in on Bitcoin Core v30's OP_RETURN expansion has everyone talking. What's the deal?

區塊鏈，尼克·薩博（Nick Szabo），比特幣核心（Bitcoin Core） - 這些名字在加密鎮（Crypto Town Square）上點亮。 Szabo在休假五年後回歸，以權衡比特幣Core V30的OP_Return擴展，這使每個人都在講話。有什麼交易？

Szabo's Back: Why It Matters

Szabo的背：為什麼重要

Nick Szabo, the mind behind Bit Gold, is a legend in these parts. When he speaks, folks listen. His recent return to the scene is all about the Bitcoin Core v30 update, specifically the OP_RETURN feature.

尼克·薩博（Nick Szabo）是金黃金背後的思想，是這些部分的傳奇。當他說話時，人們會聽。他最近重返現場的是關於比特幣核心V30更新，特別是OP_Return功能。

Bitcoin Core v30: The Heart of the Matter

比特幣核心V30：問題的核心

Bitcoin Core v30 is a major update, bringing a new wallet format and simplifying commands. But the real drama? OP_RETURN. This feature lets users embed data in transactions, and the update proposes boosting the limit from 80 bytes to a whopping 4 MB. That's where the trouble begins.

比特幣Core V30是一個重大更新，帶來了新的錢包格式和簡化命令。但是真正的戲劇？ op_return。此功能使用戶可以將數據嵌入到交易中，並且該更新提出將極限從80個字節提高到4 MB的限制。那是麻煩開始的地方。

The Purist vs. Maximalist Showdown

純粹主義者與最大主義攤牌

Here's where things get spicy. Bitcoin purists believe the blockchain should stick to financial transactions. They worry that allowing more data bloats the chain, raises costs, and opens the door for spam and malware. Maximalists, on the other hand, argue that users paying fees should use block space as they see fit, with the market naturally regulating misuse.

這是辛辣的地方。比特幣純粹主義者認為，區塊鏈應該堅持金融交易。他們擔心允許更多數據膨脹鏈條，提高成本並為垃圾郵件和惡意軟件打開大門。另一方面，最大主義者認為，支付費用的用戶應在其認為合適的情況下使用塊空間，而市場自然會調節濫用。

Szabo's Take: Legal Risks and Full Nodes

szabo的看法：法律風險和完整節點

Szabo isn't shy about his concerns. He points out that while fees protect miners, they don't adequately protect full nodes. Increasing the OP_RETURN allowance could worsen this problem and increase legal risks. Imagine illegal content stored on the blockchain – node operators could face liability.

Szabo對他的擔憂並不害羞。他指出，雖然費用保護礦工，但他們不能充分保護完整的節點。增加OP_RETTRURN津貼可能會使這個問題惡化並增加法律風險。想像一下存儲在區塊鏈上的非法內容 - 節點操作員可能會面臨責任。

Szabo stated on X: “Fees protect the miners, but they don’t provide enough disincentive to protect the full nodes...increasing the OP_RETURN allowance will likely make this problem worse. It will also increase legal risks.”

Szabo在X上說：“費用保護礦工，但他們沒有提供足夠的抑製作用來保護完整的節點...增加OP_Retnurn津貼可能會使這個問題變得更糟。它也會增加法律風險。”

The $44 Million Bitcoin Mystery

耗資4400萬美元的比特幣之謎

Adding to the intrigue, a 2013 Bitcoin address recently moved $44 million worth of BTC. Some speculate it's related to legal caution, security measures, or even protesting potential state laws. Szabo himself suggested it could be someone moving their Bitcoin in preparation for such a law, while simultaneously protesting it.

除Intigue外，2013年的比特幣地址最近提出了價值4400萬美元的BTC。一些人推測它與法律謹慎，安全措施甚至抗議潛在的州法律有關。 Szabo本人建議，可能有人在為這樣的法律做準備時，同時抗議該法律。

My Two Satoshis

我的兩個satoshis

Personally, I think Szabo's concerns about legal risks are valid. The blockchain's immutability is a double-edged sword. While it's great for security, it also means that illegal or harmful data could be permanently stored. Finding a balance between freedom and responsibility will be crucial for Bitcoin's long-term success.

就個人而言，我認為Szabo對法律風險的擔憂是有效的。區塊鏈的不變性是一把雙刃劍。儘管這非常適合安全，但也意味著可以永久存儲非法或有害數據。在自由和責任之間找到平衡對於比特幣的長期成功至關重要。

The Bottom Line

底線

Bitcoin's at a crossroads with v30, the OP_RETURN debate, and looming legal risks. Szabo's return is timely, encouraging a much-needed conversation. It's a wild ride, folks, but that's crypto for ya!

比特幣與V30的十字路口，OP_Return辯論以及迫在眉睫的法律風險。 Szabo的回歸是及時的，鼓勵了急需的對話。伙計們，這是一個瘋狂的旅程，但這是您的加密貨幣！