比特幣核心V30，Nick Szabo和OP_Return Legal Quagmire

比特幣核心的V30更新引發了有關OP_RET_RETURN數據限制和節點運營商潛在的法律風險的辯論，而Nick Szabo的權重。

Bitcoin Core's upcoming v30 update, while bringing improvements, has ignited a fiery debate. The crux? Changes to the OP_RETURN field, potentially allowing larger amounts of arbitrary data in transactions, and legendary cryptographer Nick Szabo has entered the fray, raising serious concerns.

比特幣Core即將進行的V30更新，同時進行了改進，引發了激烈的辯論。關鍵？ OP_Return字段的更改可能允許交易中大量的任意數據，而傳奇的密碼師Nick Szabo進入了競爭，引起了嚴重的關注。

The OP_RETURN Expansion: A Double-Edged Sword

OP_Return擴展：雙刃劍

The v30 update loosens restrictions on the OP_RETURN opcode, which allows embedding data in Bitcoin transactions. Previously capped at 80 bytes, the limit could expand to nearly 4 megabytes. Proponents envision new use cases, arguing that users should be free to utilize block space if they pay the fees. However, critics fear blockchain bloat, increased storage costs, and potential spam.

V30更新鬆開了對OP_RETURN OPCODE的限制，該OPCODE允許將數據嵌入比特幣交易中。以前限制為80個字節，極限可能會擴展到近4兆字節。支持者設想新用例，認為用戶應支付費用，應自由使用塊空間。但是，批評家擔心區塊鏈的膨脹，增加存儲成本和潛在的垃圾郵件。

Szabo's Legal Concerns: A Wake-Up Call

Szabo的法律問題：喚醒電話

Nick Szabo's intervention has amplified the debate. He warns that larger OP_RETURN allowances could heighten legal exposure for node operators. While fees might deter miners, they don't shield nodes from legal scrutiny. Szabo argues that readily accessible illegal content could be viewed as a liability risk, especially if easily retrievable via common software.

尼克·薩博（Nick Szabo）的干預擴大了辯論。他警告說，更大的OP_Return津貼可能會增加節點操作員的法律曝光率。雖然費用可能會阻止礦工，但他們不會將節點避免不受法律審查。 Szabo認為，可以輕鬆訪問的非法內容可以看作是責任風險，尤其是在通過常見軟件輕鬆檢索的情況下。

Szabo highlights a crucial point: legal perceptions matter. It's not just about technical nuances, but how lawyers, judges, and jurors perceive a node operator's knowledge. If illicit material is easily accessible through a user-friendly app, it could weigh heavily against the operator.

Szabo強調了一個關鍵點：法律看法很重要。這不僅與技術細微差別有關，還與律師，法官和陪審員如何看待節點操作員的知識有關。如果通過用戶友好的應用可以輕鬆訪問非法材料，它可能會與操作員重大權衡。

Pruning vs. Accessibility: A Tricky Balance

修剪與可訪問性：棘手的平衡

The pro-Core argument suggests that OP_RETURN data, being prunable, is less risky than hiding data in non-prunable parts of transactions. Szabo acknowledges this but counters that easily accessible, standard-format illegal content is more likely to raise legal red flags than fragmented or hidden data requiring specialized tools.

親核論證表明，op_return數據可易於核能，與在交易的不可縮減部分中隱藏數據相比，風險較小。 Szabo承認這一點，但反駁說，易於訪問，標準形式的非法內容比需要專業工具的零散或隱藏的數據更有可能引起合法的危險信號。

Navigating the Legal Minefield: Potential Mitigations

導航法律雷區：潛在的緩解

Szabo suggests two mitigation strategies. First, discourage popular apps from easily storing and retrieving generic media via OP_RETURN or witness data. Second, advocate for liability regimes that focus on transaction signers rather than relay/storage intermediaries.

Szabo提出了兩種緩解策略。首先，阻止流行的應用程序通過OP_Return或證人數據輕鬆存儲和檢索通用媒體。其次，倡導責任制度，專注於交易簽名者而不是中繼/存儲中介機構。

The Road Ahead: Caution and Heterogeneity

前面的道路：謹慎和異質性

Szabo emphasizes that he's still exploring the issues and hasn't taken a definitive side. He underscores the complexity of legal matters and the need for node operators to develop context-specific solutions, avoiding censorship of legitimate payments. The key takeaway? The technical path may be clear, but the legal terrain is treacherous.

Szabo強調，他仍在探索這些問題，並且沒有確定的一面。他強調了法律事務的複雜性以及節點運營商需要開發特定於上下文的解決方案，避免對合法付款進行審查。關鍵要點？技術途徑可能很明顯，但法律地形是危險的。

So, while the Bitcoin community wrestles with these weighty issues, one thing's for sure: it's never a dull day in the world of crypto. Just remember, folks, even in the decentralized realm of Bitcoin, the long arm of the law can reach you. Keep those nodes clean and your legal counsel on speed dial!

因此，雖然比特幣社區與這些沉重的問題搏鬥，但可以肯定的是：這在加密貨幣世界中絕不是沉悶的一天。請記住，即使在比特幣的分散領域，法律的長臂也可以到達您。在快速撥號上保持這些節點清潔和您的法律顧問！