![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
A unilateral decision by Bitcoin Core will scrap the controversial OP-Return limit.
The proposal to remove the 80-byte limit on OP_RETURN outputs was accepted and will feature in the next release of the most widely used node software.
With the change, the limit on adding arbitrary data to Bitcoin transactions will no longer apply.
“Bitcoin Core’s next release will, by default, relay and mine transactions whose OP_RETURN outputs exceed 80 bytes and allow any number of these outputs,” announced Bitcoin developer Greg Sanders on GitHub on May 5.
The long-standing limit was originally a “gentle signal that block space should be used sparingly for non-payment proof of publication data, but it has outlived its utility,” he stated.
The change, which was requested by Chaincode Labs and had contributions from Peter Todd, an early Bitcoin innovator, is covered by pull request no. 32359.
What Is OP_RETURN?
OP_RETURN is a script opcode that people can use to write arbitrary data on the blockchain and also mark a transaction output as invalid.
Unlike typical transaction outputs, OP_RETURN outputs cannot be used for spending and don't impact the number of unspent transaction outputs (UTXOs).
According to Sanders, the initial limit no longer serves its purpose, with people exploiting methods like fake output addresses that worsen the network and some mining services disregarding the restriction.
“Inscriptions of large data are happening regardless and can be done in more or less abusive ways; the cap merely channels them into more opaque forms that cause damage to the network.”
Removing the limit, he argued, “yields at least two tangible benefits: a cleaner UTXO set and more consistent default behavior.”
Three options were evaluated: keeping the cap, raising it, or removing it. They decided to eliminate the cap, which garnered “broad, though perhaps not unanimous, support.”
“Many users find this to be an undesirable change for a number of reasons,” said Bitcoiner Samson Mow on X on May 5.
Adding that users “can refuse to upgrade and stay on 29.0 or run another implementation” of the network.
This Point of View: Bitcoin Devs' Unilateral Decision Sparks Outrage
Critics argued that the proposal lacked proper consensus and DEVI expressed concerns about Bitcoin's financial utility being downshifted. They also pointed out the possibility of undisclosed conflicts of interest.
“I think one thing is pretty clear, there is no moment on this issue at the moment. DEVI
免責聲明:info@kdj.com
所提供的資訊並非交易建議。 kDJ.com對任何基於本文提供的資訊進行的投資不承擔任何責任。加密貨幣波動性較大,建議您充分研究後謹慎投資!
如果您認為本網站使用的內容侵犯了您的版權,請立即聯絡我們(info@kdj.com),我們將及時刪除。
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- 印度最高法院將比特幣交易與哈瓦拉相比,敦促政府制定明確的加密法規。
- 2025-06-08 16:30:13
- 印度最高法院將比特幣交易與現代版本的非法貨幣轉移進行了比較。這些言論是在保釋聽證會上的
-
-
- 以太坊生態系統中的Stablecoin市值躍升了約100萬倍
- 2025-06-08 16:25:13
- 自代幣首次達到1400美元以來,以太坊生態系統中的Stablecoin市值躍升了約100萬倍