比特幣核心，結和統計數據：節點戰爭加熱！

比特幣節點景觀越來越辣！我們正在研究比特幣核心和打結之間的辯論，圍繞節點統計的戲劇以及對比特幣未來的影響。

Bitcoin Core, Knots, and Stats: A Node War Heats Up!

比特幣核心，結和統計數據：節點戰爭加熱！

Hold on to your hats, Bitcoin enthusiasts! The world of Bitcoin nodes is experiencing some serious turbulence. We're seeing heated debates, accusations of statistical manipulation, and even threats of forked software. Buckle up as we untangle the drama surrounding Bitcoin Core, Knots, and the crucial statistics that define the network's landscape.

抓住帽子，比特幣愛好者！比特幣節點的世界正在經歷嚴重的動盪。我們看到了激烈的辯論，統計操縱的指控，甚至是分叉軟件的威脅。當我們解開圍繞比特幣核心，結的戲劇性以及定義網絡景觀的關鍵統計數據時。

The Core vs. Knots Showdown

核心與結對決

For those new to the game, Bitcoin Core remains the dominant Bitcoin node software. However, Knots, a Core alternative championed by Luke Dashjr, has been steadily gaining traction, fueled by ideological differences and a desire for stricter default policies.

對於那些新的遊戲的人，比特幣核心仍然是主要的比特幣節點軟件。然而，由盧克·達什（Luke Dashjr）倡導的核心替代方案一直在穩步獲得關注，這是由於意識形態上的差異和對​​更嚴格的默認政策的渴望所吸引的。

Statistical Skirmishes: Are Knots Nodes Being Overcounted?

統計小規模衝突：結節點是否過分？

Recently, accusations flew regarding the accuracy of Knots node statistics. Bitcoin Core developers initially claimed that a significant portion of Knots nodes were being double-counted, suggesting a “sybil attack” was inflating their numbers. SuperTestnet fueled this skepticism, alleging Knots’ real dominance might be lower than reported.

最近，指控因結節點統計數據的準確性而飛逝。比特幣核心開發人員最初聲稱，有很大一部分的結節點被雙重計數，這表明“ Sybil攻擊”正在誇大其數量。 Supertestnet引起了這種懷疑，指控結的真正統治力可能低於報導。

However, this claim quickly unraveled. Start9, a Bitcoin hardware company, stepped in, explaining that many of the suspected “fake” nodes were actually legitimate nodes from their storefront. SuperTestnet retracted much of his original statement, and CalleBTC deleted a celebratory post based on the dubious stats. It seems the initial claims were a bit premature, showcasing the challenges of accurately tracking node distribution.

但是，這一說法很快就解開了。比特幣硬件公司Start9介入，解釋說，許多可疑的“假”節點實際上是店面的合法節點。 Supertestnet縮回了他的大部分原始聲明，Callebtc根據可疑統計數據刪除了慶祝帖子。似乎最初的主張還為時過早，展示了準確跟踪節點分佈的挑戰。

The OP_RETURN Uproar: Data Storage and the Debate Over "Spam"

OP_Return Uproar：數據存儲和“垃圾郵件”的辯論

The controversy doesn't end there. Bitcoin Core's upcoming v30 release, which loosens data storage limitations by removing the 80-byte cap on OP_RETURN payloads, has ignited a firestorm. The Knots community, led by Bitcoin Mechanic, is raising concerns that this change could lead to the hosting and relaying of illegal content, like pornography, by unsuspecting node operators. They argue that this 1,200X increase is a terrible idea.

爭議並沒有結束。 Bitcoin Core即將發布的V30發行版，通過刪除OP_Return有效載荷上的80字節帽來放鬆數據存儲限制，並點燃了火災。由比特幣機械師領導的結社區正在引起人們的擔憂，即這種變化可能會導致通過毫無戒心的節點操作員託管和傳達非法內容，例如色情內容。他們認為，這種增加1200倍是一個可怕的想法。

Bitcoin Mechanic has been vocal about the potential for malicious content, including viruses and malware, to proliferate across nodes. The Knots community plans to retain the old data cap, viewing the change as a morally indefensible compromise. This highlights a fundamental difference in philosophy: Bitcoin Core aims to accommodate economic demand, even for non-financial data, while Knots prioritizes stricter policies to prevent potential misuse.

比特幣機械師一直在發聲惡意含量（包括病毒和惡意軟件）跨節點增殖的潛力。結婚社區計劃保留舊數據上限，將變化視為道德上無可辯駁的妥協。這凸顯了哲學上的根本差異：比特幣核心旨在適應經濟需求，即使是非金融數據，而結對防止潛在濫用的更嚴格的政策優先考慮。

The Threat of a Fork: Censorship Resistance and Base-Layer Neutrality

叉子的威脅：抵抗和基層中立性

Adding fuel to the fire, Leonidas, a prominent figure in the Bitcoin Ordinals movement, has threatened to fund an alternative version of Bitcoin Core if it tightens policy rules in a way that harms Ordinals and Runes transactions. He argues that the Ordinals/Runes economy has contributed significantly to Bitcoin's security through transaction fees and insists on base-layer neutrality.

在大火中增加了燃料，列昂尼達斯（Leonidas）是比特幣序列運動中的傑出人物，威脅要為比特幣核心的替代版本提供資金，如果它以損害序列和符合交易的方式加強政策規則。他認為，序數/符文經濟通過交易費用為比特幣的安全做出了重大貢獻，並堅持基本層中立性。

This threat underscores the tension between different factions within the Bitcoin community and the importance of user choice. Adam Back, Blockstream CEO, rightly points out that Bitcoin is owned by humanity, and developers are stewards who need consensus to make material changes. The market is already “voting” with its node software, as Knots has experienced a surge in popularity amid the relay-policy fight.

這種威脅強調了比特幣社區內不同派系之間的張力與用戶選擇的重要性。 Blockstream首席執行官Adam Back正確地指出，比特幣是人類擁有的，開發人員是需要共識才能進行重大更改的管家。市場已經通過其節點軟件進行“投票”，因為在接力賽戰鬥中，調子在流行中經歷了流行。

My Two Satoshis

我的兩個satoshis

The drama surrounding Bitcoin Core, Knots, and node statistics highlights the ongoing evolution of Bitcoin. While the initial accusations of statistical manipulation against Knots appear to have been overstated, the debate over data storage limits and censorship resistance is far from over. It's crucial for the community to engage in open and honest dialogue to find solutions that balance innovation with security and ethical considerations.

圍繞比特幣核心，結和節點統計數據的戲劇突出了比特幣的持續發展。雖然對結統計操作的最初指控似乎已經誇大了，但有關數據存儲限制和審查制度抵抗的爭論還遠遠沒有結束。對於社區而言，進行開放和誠實的對話至關重要，以找到平衡創新與安全和道德考慮的解決方案。

Ultimately, the beauty of Bitcoin lies in its decentralized nature. Users have the power to choose the software that aligns with their values and priorities. Whether you're a Core maximalist, a Knots enthusiast, or somewhere in between, remember to stay informed, question assumptions, and contribute to the ongoing conversation. After all, Bitcoin is a work in progress, and its future depends on the collective wisdom of its community.

最終，比特幣的美麗在於其分散的本質。用戶有權選擇與其價值和優先級保持一致的軟件。無論您是核心的最大主義者，一個結的愛好者還是介於兩者之間的某個地方，都記得保持知情，質疑假設並為正在進行的對話做出貢獻。畢竟，比特幣是一項正在進行的工作，其未來取決於其社區的集體智慧。

So, What's Next?

那麼，下一步是什麼？

Keep an eye on the Bitcoin Core v30 release and the ongoing debate surrounding data storage limits. The choices node operators make will shape the future of the network. And remember, whether you're crunching numbers or debating policy, don't forget to HODL... your sense of humor, that is!

密切關注比特幣核心V30版本以及圍繞數據存儲限制的持續辯論。選擇節點運算符的選擇將影響網絡的未來。請記住，無論您是處理數字還是辯論政策，都不要忘記霍德（Hodl）...您的幽默感，就是這樣！