比特幣核心開發人員刪除了OP_Return輸出的80字節限制，以更有效的方式允許更多數據

比特幣（BTC）核心開發人員已決定在下一個網絡升級中刪除交易數據的限制，從而使更多數據以更有效的方式包含。

Bitcoin Core developers have decided to remove a limit on transaction data in the next network upgrade, enabling more data to be included in a more efficient way.

比特幣核心開發人員已決定在下一個網絡升級中刪除交易數據的限制，從而使更多數據以更有效的方式包含。

“Bitcoin Core’s next release will, by default, relay and mine transactions whose OP_RETURN outputs exceed 80 bytes and allow any number of these outputs,” announced Bitcoin developer Greg Sanders on GitHub on May 5.

比特幣開發商Greg Sanders在Github上宣布：“默認情況下，比特幣核心的下一個發行版將超過80個字節，默認情況下，接力賽和礦山交易。”

The long-standing limit was originally a “gentle signal that block space should be used sparingly for non-payment proof of publication data,” which has outlived its utility, he added.

他補充說，長期存在的限制最初是一個“寬敞的信號，表明應少付空間用於非付款證明出版數據的信號”，這已經超過了其實用程序。

The proposal (PR 32359) was created by Bitcoin pioneer Peter Todd at the request of Chaincode Labs.

該提案（PR 32359）是由比特幣先驅彼得·托德（Peter Todd）應鏈碼實驗室的要求創建的。

OP_RETURN is a special type of Bitcoin (BTC) transaction output that allows storing small amounts of data on the blockchain, popularized during the ordinals inscriptions craze in early 2024.

OP_RETURN是一種特殊類型的比特幣（BTC）交易輸出，它允許在2024年初在Ordinals銘文銘文中普及的區塊鏈上存儲少量數據。

Unlike regular transaction outputs, OP_RETURN outputs are not spendable and don’t bloat unspent transaction outputs (UTXOs).

與常規交易輸出不同，OP_Return輸出不可用，也不會膨脹未解決的交易輸出（UTXOS）。

The original limit is no longer effective as people found ways around it, such as using fake output addresses, which are actually worse for the network, while some mining services were already ignoring the limit, Sanders said.

桑德斯說，最初的限制不再有效，因為人們發現了圍繞它的方式，例如使用偽造的輸出地址對網絡來說實際上更糟，而某些採礦服務已經忽略了限制。

Benefits of removing the limit include a cleaner UTXO set, or database of spendable outputs, more consistent behavior across the network, and better alignment with how Bitcoin is actually being used, he added.

他補充說，刪除限制的好處包括一個清潔的UTXO集，或可支出的輸出的數據庫，整個網絡上更一致的行為以及更好地與比特幣實際使用的方式保持一致。

Three possible paths were considered: keeping the cap, raising the cap and removing the cap, which was ultimately decided upon after earning “broad, though not perhaps unanimous, support.”

考慮了三個可能的途徑：保持帽子，舉起帽子並卸下帽子，在獲得“廣泛但也不是一致的支持”之後，最終決定了帽子。

A controversial change to Bitcoin

比特幣有爭議的變化

“Many users find this to be an undesirable change for a number of reasons,” said Bitcoiner Samson Mow.

Bitcoiner Samson Mow說：“許多用戶發現這是不良的變化，原因有很多。”

Users “can refuse to upgrade and stay on 29.0 or run another implementation” of the network, he added.

他補充說。

Critics said that the proposal was introduced without a proper consensus process.

批評者說，該提案是在沒有適當共識過程的情況下提出的。

“I think one thing is pretty clear, there is no moment at on this OP_RETURN issue,” said Ten31 Fund managing partner Marty Bent.

Ten31基金管理合夥人Marty Bent說：“我認為一件事很清楚，在這個op_ternurn問題上沒有時刻。”

Some also expressed concerns about deprioritizing Bitcoin’s financial utility and raised questions about undisclosed conflicts of interest.

一些人還表示擔心比特幣的金融公用事業，並提出了有關未公開的利益衝突的疑問。