比特幣核心開發者 Luke Dashjr 對比特幣社群的現狀表示擔憂

比特幣核心開發者 Luke Dashjr 對比特幣社群的現狀表示擔憂，並與七年前發生的情況進行了比較

Bitcoin Core developer Luke Dashjr has expressed concerns about the current state of affairs within the Bitcoin community, drawing comparisons to events that transpired seven years ago during the Segwit activation.

比特幣核心開發人員 Luke Dashjr 對比特幣社群當前的狀況表示擔憂，並將其與七年前隔離見證啟動期間發生的事件進行了比較。

According to Dashjr’s comments, there is a growing discussion within the community about the need to increase active users and update spam filters. Segwit, a major protocol update designed to increase transaction efficiency and reduce fees, was activated by the Bitcoin community seven years prior. This decision was made despite initial opposition from Bitcoin Core developers, who believed that such decisions should be made solely by miners.

根據 Dashjr 的評論，社群內關於增加活躍用戶和更新垃圾郵件過濾器的必要性的討論越來越多。 Segwit 是一項重大協議更新，旨在提高交易效率並降低費用，七年前由比特幣社群啟動。儘管比特幣核心開發者最初反對，但還是做出了這個決定，他們認為此類決定應該完全由礦工做出。

The activation of Segwit marked a significant moment in Bitcoin’s history, demonstrating the power of the community to drive protocol upgrades. Dashjr now sees parallels in the ongoing discourse surrounding planned changes to Bitcoin’s spam filter. In a recent tweet, he expressed his discontent with the community's passivity, suggesting that many have become either too comfortable or dissatisfied with the present course of events.

隔離見證的啟動標誌著比特幣歷史上的一個重要時刻，展示了社區推動協議升級的力量。 Dashjr 現在看到了圍繞比特幣垃圾郵件過濾器計劃變更的持續討論的相似之處。在最近的一條推文中，他表達了對社區消極態度的不滿，暗示許多人要么對目前的事態變得過於安逸或不滿意。

Highlighting the decentralized nature of Bitcoin in contrast to centralized fiat currencies, Dashjr’s commentsunderscore the importance of engaged users within the Bitcoin community. According to Dashjr, to maintain the true essence of Bitcoin’s decentralization, users should be making the decisions, not a centralized government body. This perspective aligns with the core philosophy behind Bitcoin's creation as a decentralized financial system alternative.

Dashjr 的評論強調了比特幣與中心化法定貨幣相比的去中心化性質，強調了比特幣社群中參與用戶的重要性。根據 Dashjr 的說法，為了保持比特幣去中心化的真正本質，決策者應該是用戶，而不是中央政府機構。這種觀點與比特幣作為去中心化金融系統替代方案的核心概念是一致的。

Within the community, there is an ongoing debate about the necessity of updating spam filters. While some argue that stronger spam filters are needed to maintain network efficiency and reduce the volume of useless transactions, others raise concerns about the potential for censorship, which would go against Bitcoin’s foundational principle of open and transparent transactions.

在社群內，關於更新垃圾郵件過濾器的必要性一直存在爭論。雖然有些人認為需要更強大的垃圾郵件過濾器來維持網路效率並減少無用交易量，但其他人則對審查制度的可能性表示擔憂，這將違背比特幣公開透明交易的基本原則。