The eighth review of the ten comments. Bitcoin’s conversion to quantum-resistant algorithm proposed to use Adam Back with Sphinx. In fact. he basically doesn’t understand quantum-resistant. Maybe this algorithm will never be implemented. I will see if the

Bitcoin is returning to zero! Because it is basically impossible to completely upgrade and migrate to suitable algorithms that resist quantum computer cracking in a timely and in full. Without a suitable algorithm, it is even more impossible. Pay special attention ⚠️Adam Back, who has the most say in Bitcoin, was announced on June 3, 2025. In his opinion, it is most suitable for Bitcoin's current anti-quantum algorithm, which is a hash function signature: the only non-full-original management hash function signature, Sphinx Sphincs+. ⚠️ Bitcoin probably started in 2026/2027, and there was a clear dispersion of consensus; ⚠️ And it was probably zeroing in the order of magnitude by 2035! Bitcoin is by no means suitable to join any country's strategic reserves before it is fully upgraded to quantum-resistant algorithms. Starting from August 2024, the world is dominated by the United States, and is upgrading and migrating almost all cloud, data, communication, finance, and infrastructure systems to quantum-resistant algorithms. There are basically no feasible and credible legal processes and methods. In the legal processes of any certain country, determining any Bitcoin address is the property rights of a specific individual. So it is possible that anyone's Bitcoin may also be any third-party Bitcoin, so where can it be destroyed? Where does the legal liability for quantum attacks come from? Which country's legal liability belongs to? The future that has begun is about ten years or even less, and all digital currencies will be successfully adopted to resist quantum computer cracking algorithms. All 21 million bitcoins are converted to algorithms that resist quantum computer cracking. It can be discussed in four or five parts. However, after-processing should be done after migration; migration must be after upgrading is completed; upgrade must be after algorithm selection; algorithm selection must increase its block size; and there must be a suitable quantum-resistant algorithm available. The following are four parts: Upgrade: Similar to decorating an old house, "upgrade" for the 1 million pie that has not been dug out in the future. Upgrading is very difficult because there is basically no quantum-resistant algorithm that meets the existing requirements of big cake state. There are only barely suitable quantum-resistant algorithms. Migration: Similar to moving to a renovated new house, 14 million "living" big cake, "migrating" to a new algorithm, it takes about one to ten years to process? Still not to deal with it. "Late-stage diabetic feet": a big cake with a long-term inactive amount of about 6 million, similar to "Late-stage diabetic feet", should I deal with it? Is this processing method operable? How to operate? Or not deal with it and let quantum computers crack it 20 years later? Whether it is amputation or cracking of static quantum computers, it is protracted. This protracted prolongedness will bring a soft knife to the consensus of Bitcoin. This kind of protracted and protracted is our beautiful Chinese dialect "no filial son in front of the bed for a long time"! As sir! How to define the undefinable part? Including that British engineer James Howell, who is a big cake for his 8,000 garbage dumps? Bitcoin is returning to zero!