Market Cap: $3.2672T -0.710%
Volume(24h): $102.3379B -6.020%
  • Market Cap: $3.2672T -0.710%
  • Volume(24h): $102.3379B -6.020%
  • Fear & Greed Index:
  • Market Cap: $3.2672T -0.710%
Cryptos
Topics
Cryptospedia
News
CryptosTopics
Videos
Top News
Cryptos
Topics
Cryptospedia
News
CryptosTopics
Videos
bitcoin
bitcoin

$107295.810621 USD

-0.60%

ethereum
ethereum

$2438.191256 USD

-2.24%

tether
tether

$1.000355 USD

0.01%

xrp
xrp

$2.107400 USD

-4.14%

bnb
bnb

$645.196047 USD

-0.58%

solana
solana

$140.861296 USD

-3.48%

usd-coin
usd-coin

$0.999977 USD

0.05%

tron
tron

$0.271724 USD

-0.74%

dogecoin
dogecoin

$0.162450 USD

-2.18%

cardano
cardano

$0.559765 USD

-2.72%

hyperliquid
hyperliquid

$36.577660 USD

-2.60%

bitcoin-cash
bitcoin-cash

$491.980353 USD

1.63%

sui
sui

$2.645087 USD

-4.57%

chainlink
chainlink

$13.061914 USD

-2.28%

unus-sed-leo
unus-sed-leo

$9.014317 USD

0.12%

Cryptocurrency News Articles

A single victim was scammed two times within three hours, losing a total of $2.6 million in stablecoins.

May 26, 2025 at 05:15 pm

According to data shared on May 26 by crypto compliance firm Cyvers, the victim sent 843,000 worth of USDt (USDT), followed by another 1.75 million USDt around three hours later.

A single victim was scammed two times within three hours, losing a total of $2.6 million in stablecoins, according to data shared by crypto compliance firm Cyvers.

The victim sent 843,000 worth of USDt (USDT), followed by another 1.75 million USDT around three hours later, the firm said on May 26. The scam used a method known as a zero-value transfer, a sophisticated form of onchain phishing.

A zero-value transfer occurs when an attacker exploits the token transfer From function to transfer zero tokens from the victim’s wallet to a spoofed address. Since the amount transferred is zero, no signature by the victim’s private key is necessary for onchain inclusion.

The victim will then see the incoming transaction in their history, and may trust this address since it is included in their transaction history, making them think it’s a known or safe recipient. They may then send real funds to the attacker’s address in a future transaction.

In one high-profile case, a scammer using a zero-transfer phishing attack managed to steal $20 million worth of USDT before getting blacklisted by the stablecoin’s issuer in the summer of 2023.

A zero-value transfer is an evolution of address poisoning, a tactic where attackers send small amounts of cryptocurrency from a wallet address that resembles a victim’s real address, often with the same starting and ending characters. The goal is to trick the user into accidentally copying and reusing the attacker’s address in future transactions, resulting in lost funds.

The technique exploits how users often rely on partial address matching or clipboard history when sending crypto. Custom addresses with similar starting and ending characters can also be combined with zero-value transfers.

A January study by TRGARD found that over 270 million poisoning attempts occurred on BNB Chain and Ethereum between July 1, 2022, and June 30, 2024. Of those, 6,000 attempts were successful, leading to losses over $83 million.

The report followed crypto cybersecurity firm Trugard and onchain trust protocol Webacy announcing an artificial intelligence-based system for detecting crypto wallet address poisoning. The new tool has a success score of 97%, tested across known attack cases.

Disclaimer:info@kdj.com

The information provided is not trading advice. kdj.com does not assume any responsibility for any investments made based on the information provided in this article. Cryptocurrencies are highly volatile and it is highly recommended that you invest with caution after thorough research!

If you believe that the content used on this website infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately (info@kdj.com) and we will delete it promptly.

Other articles published on Jun 27, 2025