Market Cap: $2.8389T -0.70%
Volume(24h): $167.3711B 6.46%
Fear & Greed Index:

28 - Fear

  • Market Cap: $2.8389T -0.70%
  • Volume(24h): $167.3711B 6.46%
  • Fear & Greed Index:
  • Market Cap: $2.8389T -0.70%
Cryptos
Topics
Cryptospedia
News
CryptosTopics
Videos
Top Cryptospedia

Select Language

Select Language

Select Currency

Cryptos
Topics
Cryptospedia
News
CryptosTopics
Videos

How to revoke permissions on Trust Wallet? How to protect yourself from malicious contracts?

Trust Wallet users must manually revoke token allowances via tools like Revoke.cash—disconnecting dApps doesn’t remove permissions, and revocation always incurs gas fees.

Dec 26, 2025 at 06:39 am

Understanding Permission Revocation in Trust Wallet

1. Trust Wallet stores private keys locally and interacts with Ethereum-compatible blockchains through wallet-connected dApps. When users approve a token or interact with a smart contract, they often grant allowance — a permission that lets the contract spend tokens on their behalf.

2. These allowances persist unless manually revoked, meaning even inactive or abandoned dApps may retain control over certain assets indefinitely.

3. Users can access the “Settings” menu inside Trust Wallet, then navigate to “Privacy & Security” and select “Connected Sites” to review active dApp connections, though this does not show token-level allowances.

4. To inspect or revoke token-specific approvals, third-party tools like Etherscan’s Token Approvals Checker or Revoke.cash must be used by entering the wallet address and selecting the target blockchain network.

5. Once identified, users initiate a transaction to set the approved amount to zero — a process requiring gas fees and confirmation via the wallet interface.

Identifying Malicious Contract Patterns

1. Contracts with functions named transferOwnership, renounceOwnership, or setAdmin may indicate centralized control points that developers could exploit post-deployment.

2. A lack of verified source code on Etherscan or BscScan raises immediate red flags — unverified contracts prevent independent audit of logic and hidden backdoors.

3. Functions such as emergencyWithdraw, pause, or freeze without transparent governance mechanisms suggest unilateral authority retained by deployers.

4. Contracts that implement complex withdrawal delays, mandatory lock-up periods, or require multiple confirmations from unknown addresses should be treated with skepticism.

5. High-frequency calls to external contracts or use of delegatecall with untrusted addresses increase attack surface and enable reentrancy vulnerabilities.

Wallet-Level Protection Strategies

1. Enable biometric authentication and disable “Auto-lock” settings longer than 30 seconds to reduce exposure during accidental device access.

2. Avoid scanning QR codes from unsolicited messages or clicking shortened links claiming to lead to “airdrop claim pages” — these frequently redirect to phishing dApps requesting signature approvals.

3. Use separate wallets for high-value assets and experimental interactions; never import seed phrases into browser extensions or unfamiliar mobile interfaces.

4. Monitor pending transactions carefully before signing — malicious dApps often request signatures for seemingly benign actions like “connect wallet” or “verify identity”, which actually authorize contract interactions.

5. Disable unused blockchain networks within Trust Wallet settings to limit cross-chain exposure and reduce confusion when switching between networks like Ethereum, BSC, and Polygon.

On-Chain Verification Tools and Practices

1. Before approving any token contract, verify its deployment address against official project documentation — discrepancies in capitalization or minor character changes often signal impersonation.

2. Cross-check contract creation transaction hash on Etherscan; legitimate projects usually disclose this information across verified social channels and GitHub repositories.

3. Use Tenderly or BlockSec’s contract debugger to simulate function calls and observe state changes without committing real transactions.

4. Check if the contract implements OpenZeppelin’s Ownable or AccessControl patterns — while not foolproof, standardized implementations allow clearer analysis of permission structures.

5. Review historical transaction activity: contracts with no transfers, only internal calls, or sudden spikes in approval events warrant deeper scrutiny.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Can I revoke permissions without paying gas fees?A: No. Revoking an allowance requires writing data to the blockchain, which always incurs gas. Some tools estimate minimal fees by optimizing transaction parameters, but zero-cost revocation is impossible on Ethereum Virtual Machine-compatible chains.

Q: Does deleting a dApp connection in Trust Wallet remove token allowances?A: No. Disconnecting a site only terminates session-based access. Token allowances remain active until explicitly reset via a transaction targeting the specific contract’s approve function.

Q: Are BEP-20 and ERC-20 revocation methods identical?A: Yes. Both standards inherit the same approve mechanism from the original ERC-20 specification. The revocation process is functionally equivalent across BSC, Ethereum, and compatible chains.

Q: What happens if I revoke permissions for a staking contract I’m actively using?A: You will no longer be able to deposit, withdraw, or compound rewards until you re-approve the required amount. Revocation does not affect existing staked balances or accrued yield — only future interaction capabilities.

Disclaimer:info@kdj.com

The information provided is not trading advice. kdj.com does not assume any responsibility for any investments made based on the information provided in this article. Cryptocurrencies are highly volatile and it is highly recommended that you invest with caution after thorough research!

If you believe that the content used on this website infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately (info@kdj.com) and we will delete it promptly.

Related knowledge

See all articles

User not found or password invalid

Your input is correct