Market Cap: $2.8588T -5.21%
Volume(24h): $157.21B 50.24%
Fear & Greed Index:

38 - Fear

  • Market Cap: $2.8588T -5.21%
  • Volume(24h): $157.21B 50.24%
  • Fear & Greed Index:
  • Market Cap: $2.8588T -5.21%
Cryptos
Topics
Cryptospedia
News
CryptosTopics
Videos
Top Cryptospedia

Select Language

Select Language

Select Currency

Cryptos
Topics
Cryptospedia
News
CryptosTopics
Videos

What are the best alternatives to mining Ethereum after the merge?

Post-Merge, Ethereum staking replaces mining—validators stake 32 ETH for rewards (3–5% APY), while liquid staking (e.g., stETH) offers liquidity and DeFi composability, albeit with smart contract and de-peg risks.

Jan 25, 2026 at 11:00 am

Staking Ethereum Directly

1. After the Merge, Ethereum transitioned from proof-of-work to proof-of-stake, rendering traditional GPU mining obsolete.

2. Validators can now participate by staking 32 ETH to run a full node and earn rewards for proposing and attesting to blocks.

3. Staking yields fluctuate based on total network staked ETH and participation rates, typically ranging between 3% and 5% annually.

4. Users who lack 32 ETH may join staking pools or use centralized exchanges offering liquid staking derivatives like stETH or rETH.

5. Running a validator requires technical setup, continuous uptime, and awareness of slashing conditions for misbehavior.

Liquid Staking Protocols

1. Liquid staking allows users to stake ETH without locking liquidity—tokens like stETH represent staked ETH plus accrued rewards.

2. These tokens are composable and can be used across DeFi protocols for lending, borrowing, or providing liquidity in AMMs.

3. Major platforms include Lido Finance, Rocket Pool, and Coinbase Wrapped Staked ETH (cbETH).

4. Each protocol has distinct fee structures, governance models, and security assumptions tied to their node operators.

5. Some liquid staking tokens have experienced de-pegging events during market stress, highlighting counterparty and oracle risks.

Participating in Layer-2 Infrastructure

1. With Ethereum’s scaling focus shifting to rollups, infrastructure providers on Optimism, Arbitrum, and Base require economic alignment.

2. Certain L2s distribute native tokens to early users, sequencers, or contributors who help secure or operate their networks.

3. Operators can run sequencers, proposers, or verifiers—some requiring staked tokens or performance bonds.

4. Token incentives often reward long-term commitment and consistent service delivery rather than computational hashing power.

5. These roles demand familiarity with modular stack components, including data availability layers and fraud or validity proofs.

Running MEV-Optimized Relays and Builders

1. Post-Merge, block construction became a competitive market where builders submit full block proposals to proposers.

2. Builders compete to maximize extractable value through efficient transaction ordering, sandwiching, and arbitrage strategies.

3. Relays act as trusted intermediaries between builders and validators, verifying blocks before relaying them to the consensus layer.

4. Operators must maintain low-latency infrastructure, understand mempool dynamics, and manage cryptographic signing workflows.

5. Revenue streams come from builder fees, relay commissions, and potential token emissions from protocols incentivizing decentralization.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Can I still mine Ethereum on a private chain after the Merge?A: Yes, private or testnet chains may continue using PoW, but those networks hold no economic value or interoperability with mainnet Ethereum.

Q: Is solo staking more profitable than using a staking pool?A: Solo staking avoids third-party fees but requires 32 ETH, technical maintenance, and exposes the operator to full slashing risk—pools offer accessibility at the cost of decentralization trade-offs.

Q: Do liquid staking tokens carry smart contract risk?A: Yes, every liquid staking token depends on the integrity of its underlying protocol contracts, oracle feeds, and governance mechanisms—audits do not eliminate all vulnerabilities.

Q: Are there tax implications unique to staking rewards versus mining income?A: In many jurisdictions, staking rewards are treated as ordinary income upon receipt, while mining previously triggered income recognition at block creation—local regulations vary significantly and require professional consultation.

Disclaimer:info@kdj.com

The information provided is not trading advice. kdj.com does not assume any responsibility for any investments made based on the information provided in this article. Cryptocurrencies are highly volatile and it is highly recommended that you invest with caution after thorough research!

If you believe that the content used on this website infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately (info@kdj.com) and we will delete it promptly.

Related knowledge

See all articles

User not found or password invalid

Your input is correct