What is the difference between Bitcoin and Ethereum? (BTC vs. ETH)

Core Purpose and Design Philosophy

1. Bitcoin was created as a decentralized digital currency with a primary focus on peer-to-peer electronic cash transactions.

2. Ethereum was designed as a decentralized computing platform enabling programmable logic through smart contracts.

3. Bitcoin’s scripting language is intentionally limited to ensure security and simplicity in value transfer.

4. Ethereum uses a Turing-complete virtual machine—the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM)—to execute complex code across its network.

5. Bitcoin prioritizes immutability and finality; Ethereum emphasizes flexibility and upgradability, demonstrated by its transition from Proof of Work to Proof of Stake.

Consensus Mechanism Evolution

1. Bitcoin continues to operate exclusively under Proof of Work (PoW), relying on computational hashing power for block validation.

2. Ethereum completed The Merge in September 2022, shifting entirely to Proof of Stake (PoS) to reduce energy consumption and improve scalability potential.

3. PoW in Bitcoin enforces predictable issuance via halving events every 210,000 blocks, reinforcing scarcity.

4. Ethereum’s PoS introduces validator staking requirements, slashing conditions, and dynamic issuance tied to network participation rates.

5. Bitcoin miners receive block rewards plus transaction fees; Ethereum validators earn base fee burns, priority fees, and MEV rewards.

Tokenomics and Supply Dynamics

1. Bitcoin has a hard-capped supply of 21 million coins, with no possibility of protocol-level inflation beyond that limit.

2. Ethereum does not have a fixed maximum supply but implements EIP-1559, which burns a portion of transaction fees, creating deflationary pressure during high usage periods.

3. Bitcoin’s emission schedule halves approximately every four years, reducing miner rewards incrementally until the last coin is mined around 2140.

4. Ethereum’s annual issuance rate post-Merge hovers between 0.2% and 0.5%, depending on active validator count and network activity.

5. Bitcoin functions primarily as digital gold—a store of value—while Ethereum serves as both a settlement layer and foundational infrastructure for decentralized applications.

Smart Contract Capabilities

1. Bitcoin supports basic scripting for multi-signature wallets and time-locked transactions but lacks native support for general-purpose smart contracts.

2. Ethereum enables developers to deploy self-executing contracts written in Solidity or Vyper, governing everything from token standards to decentralized exchanges.

3. Layer-2 solutions like Lightning Network extend Bitcoin’s functionality off-chain but do not alter its on-chain programmability limits.

4. Ethereum’s account-based model simplifies state management compared to Bitcoin’s UTXO model, facilitating richer application logic.

5. Bitcoin’s Taproot upgrade introduced Schnorr signatures and MAST, improving privacy and enabling more efficient conditional logic—but still falls short of full Turing completeness.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Can Bitcoin be used to build DeFi applications?A: Not natively. While sidechains and wrapped tokens enable indirect integration, Bitcoin’s base layer lacks the execution environment required for permissionless lending, automated market makers, or yield strategies.

Q: Does Ethereum compete with Bitcoin as a store of value?A: Some holders treat ETH as an appreciating asset due to its utility and deflationary mechanics, yet its volatility and upgrade-driven uncertainty distinguish it from BTC’s role as a benchmark digital reserve asset.

Q: Why did Ethereum switch to Proof of Stake?A: To drastically cut energy usage, enhance censorship resistance through lower hardware barriers, and lay groundwork for sharding and improved throughput without compromising decentralization.

Q: Are Bitcoin and Ethereum interoperable?A: Yes, through cross-chain bridges and atomic swaps, though these introduce trust assumptions and security trade-offs not present in native chain operations.