What's the Difference Between ERC-20 and ERC-721 Smart Contracts?

Core Functional Distinction

1. ERC-20 defines a standard for fungible tokens where each unit holds identical value and is interchangeable with another unit of the same contract.

2. ERC-721 establishes a framework for non-fungible tokens, meaning each token possesses unique attributes and cannot be replaced on a one-to-one basis.

3. ERC-20 contracts implement functions like transfer, balanceOf, and approve to manage bulk token movements across accounts.

4. ERC-721 contracts include ownerOf, safeTransferFrom, and tokenURI to handle individual token ownership and metadata retrieval.

5. The event signatures differ: ERC-20 emits Transfer(address indexed from, address indexed to, uint256 value), while ERC-721 emits Transfer(address indexed from, address indexed to, uint256 indexed tokenId).

Token Identity and Uniqueness

1. In ERC-20, token identity resides entirely in the contract address; no per-unit identifier exists beyond quantity.

2. Each ERC-721 token carries a distinct uint256 tokenId, making it possible to assign rarity, provenance, or visual traits.

3. ERC-721 allows mapping a tokenId to external resources via tokenURI, enabling dynamic metadata such as images or descriptions hosted off-chain.

4. A single ERC-721 contract may represent thousands of assets—each with its own immutable history—while maintaining consistent interface behavior.

5. Token enumeration is optional in ERC-721; many deployed contracts omit totalSupply or tokenByIndex to reduce gas overhead and privacy exposure.

Gas Consumption Patterns

1. ERC-20 transfers typically consume under 45,000 gas when moving between externally owned accounts.

2. ERC-721 transfers require more computation due to ownership validation, approval checks, and optional safety logic, often exceeding 65,000 gas.

3. Batch operations are native to ERC-20 through simple loops or custom extensions, but ERC-721 lacks standardized batch transfer support in the base spec.

4. Minting in ERC-20 usually involves increasing a balance and emitting an event, whereas ERC-721 minting requires assigning a new tokenId, setting owner, and updating internal mappings—increasing complexity.

5. Storage layout differences impact cost: ERC-20 relies heavily on mapping(address => uint256), while ERC-721 uses multiple mappings including mapping(uint256 => address) and mapping(uint256 => bool).

Interoperability and Wallet Support

1. Most Ethereum wallets natively detect and display ERC-20 balances by scanning logs for Transfer events tied to known contracts.

2. ERC-721 support varies: some wallets show thumbnails and token names only if tokenURI returns valid JSON with image and name fields.

3. Exchange listings overwhelmingly favor ERC-20 tokens due to liquidity aggregation, pricing models, and custody infrastructure built around divisible units.

4. Marketplaces like OpenSea rely on ERC-721’s ownerOf and event indexing to build real-time inventory feeds without querying every contract directly.

5. Cross-chain bridges often prioritize ERC-20 wrapping because of predictable supply mechanics, while ERC-721 bridging demands additional layers to preserve tokenId integrity and metadata fidelity.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Can an ERC-721 contract represent fractional ownership?Yes—though not part of the original standard, protocols like ERC-1155 or custom wrappers enable splitting ownership of a single tokenId across multiple addresses using secondary contracts.

Q: Is it possible to convert an ERC-20 token into an ERC-721 token?Direct conversion isn’t supported by either standard, but migration contracts can burn ERC-20 units and mint corresponding ERC-721 tokens with deterministic tokenId derivation based on sender and amount.

Q: Do all NFTs follow ERC-721?No—ERC-1155 supports both fungible and non-fungible assets in one contract, and newer standards like ERC-6551 introduce token-bound accounts that extend NFT utility beyond static representation.

Q: Why do some projects deploy both ERC-20 and ERC-721 contracts?They serve complementary roles: ERC-20 handles governance voting power or staking rewards, while ERC-721 manages access passes, collectibles, or real-world asset representations—all operating under shared economic incentives.