Market Cap: $3.6315T -1.300%
Volume(24h): $133.5557B -36.440%
Fear & Greed Index:

51 - Neutral

  • Market Cap: $3.6315T -1.300%
  • Volume(24h): $133.5557B -36.440%
  • Fear & Greed Index:
  • Market Cap: $3.6315T -1.300%
Cryptos
Topics
Cryptospedia
News
CryptosTopics
Videos
Top Cryptospedia

Select Language

Select Language

Select Currency

Cryptos
Topics
Cryptospedia
News
CryptosTopics
Videos

What is On-Chain Governance Proposal?

On-chain governance proposals, stored and executed on the blockchain, provide transparency, immutability, decentralization, and community engagement in the decision-making processes of decentralized organizations.

Feb 16, 2025 at 07:06 am

Key Points:

  • Introduction to On-chain Governance and Proposal Systems
  • Benefits and Advantages of On-chain Governance
  • Types of On-chain Governance Proposals
  • Process for Creating and Submitting On-chain Governance Proposals
  • Evaluation and Approval Process for On-chain Governance Proposals
  • Voting and Execution of On-chain Governance Proposals
  • Common Pitfalls and Challenges in On-chain Governance
  • FAQs Related to On-chain Governance and Proposals

What is On-Chain Governance Proposal?

On-chain governance proposals are a type of governance proposal that is submitted to a decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) or other blockchain-based platform for review and voting. These proposals are stored and executed on the blockchain, providing a transparent and verifiable record of the governance process.

Benefits and Advantages of On-chain Governance

  • Transparency: All proposals and votes are recorded on the blockchain, ensuring visibility and accountability.
  • Immutability: Once a proposal is approved and executed, it cannot be altered or reversed, enhancing the security and stability of the network.
  • Decentralization: Voting power is distributed among participants, eliminating the influence of central authorities.
  • Community Engagement: Proposals encourage broader participation and feedback from the community, fostering a sense of ownership and shared responsibility.

Types of On-chain Governance Proposals

  • Protocol Changes: Proposals that modify the underlying blockchain protocol or platform.
  • Feature Updates: Proposals that introduce new features or improvements to the network.
  • Budget Allocation: Proposals that distribute funds for specific projects or initiatives.
  • Ecosystem Partnerships: Proposals that establish collaborations with other projects or entities.

Process for Creating and Submitting On-chain Governance Proposals

  1. Proposer Identification: A proposal can be submitted by any member of the community or project team.
  2. Proposal Creation: The proposal is drafted and includes details such as the proposed changes, justification, and implementation plan.
  3. Proposal Submission: The proposal is submitted to the designated governance platform for review.

Evaluation and Approval Process for On-chain Governance Proposals

  1. Community Review: The proposal is open for community discussion and feedback.
  2. Governance Panel Review: A governance panel or committee evaluates the proposal and provides recommendations.
  3. Voting: Token holders participate in a vote to approve or reject the proposal.

Voting and Execution of On-chain Governance Proposals

  1. Weighted Voting: The voting system typically gives more weight to larger token holders.
  2. Quorum Requirement: A minimum number of tokens must vote to ensure participation and legitimacy.
  3. Majority Vote: The proposal passes if it receives a majority of votes from eligible voters.
  4. Execution: The approved proposal is implemented by the designated developers or execution team.

Common Pitfalls and Challenges in On-chain Governance

  • Low Participation: Achieving widespread participation in voting can be challenging, especially in large-scale DAOs.
  • Vulnerability to Attacks: On-chain governance can be susceptible to vote manipulation or hacking attempts.
  • Technical Complexity: The technical requirements for submitting and voting on proposals can deter participation.
  • Governance Fatigue: Prolonged governance processes or excessive proposals can lead to community apathy and burnout.

FAQs Related to On-chain Governance and Proposals

  • Q: What are the requirements to submit an on-chain governance proposal?

    • A: Requirements vary depending on the platform but typically include membership in the DAO or holding a minimum number of tokens.
  • Q: How is the approval threshold determined for on-chain proposals?

    • A: The approval threshold is often customizable and set by the DAO's community through a prior governance proposal.
  • Q: Can on-chain governance proposals be amended or revised after submission?

    • A: Amendments or revisions to proposals must follow the same submission and approval process as initial proposals.
  • Q: What are the potential risks associated with on-chain governance?

    • A: Risks include low participation, governance fatigue, malicious voting, and platform vulnerabilities.

Disclaimer:info@kdj.com

The information provided is not trading advice. kdj.com does not assume any responsibility for any investments made based on the information provided in this article. Cryptocurrencies are highly volatile and it is highly recommended that you invest with caution after thorough research!

If you believe that the content used on this website infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately (info@kdj.com) and we will delete it promptly.

Related knowledge

See all articles

User not found or password invalid

Your input is correct