SEI网络向以太坊提出了枢纽：战略转变

为了简化其区块链操作的大胆举动，SEI网络提出了对Cosmos的支持，而支持专门关注以太坊兼容性。

In a move that could streamline its blockchain operations and simplify development, Sei Network has proposed dropping support for Cosmos in favor of focusing exclusively on Ethereum compatibility.

为了简化其区块链操作并简化开发的举动，SEI网络提出了对宇宙的支持，而是支持专注于以太坊兼容性。

The proposal, introduced by Philip Su, Engineering Lead at Sei Labs, aims to reduce infrastructure overhead and position Sei as a stronger player within the Ethereum ecosystem.

SEI实验室的工程主管Philip Su提出的提案旨在减少基础设施开销，并将SEI定位为以太坊生态系统中更强大的参与者。

“This transition will lead to greater adoption, improved developer experience, and a more cohesive community,” Su stated in the proposal, highlighting the growing competition among blockchain platforms to attract developers and expand their ecosystems.

SU在该提案中说：“这种过渡将导致更大的采用，改善开发人员的经验以及更加凝聚力的社区。”该提案中强调了区块链平台之间不断增长的竞争，以吸引开发人员并扩大其生态系统。

Why Ethereum? The Case for EVM Dominance

为什么要以太坊？ EVM优势的情况

Ethereum’s infrastructure, powered by the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM), has become the backbone of decentralized finance (DeFi). Major blockchains like Coinbase’s Base and Binance’s BNB Chain also rely on EVM, making it the go-to choice for developers. In contrast, Cosmos operates on its own software, CosmWasm, which has seen slower adoption.

由以太坊虚拟机（EVM）驱动的以太坊的基础设施已成为分散金融（DEFI）的骨干。 Coinbase的基础和Binance的BNB链等主要区块链也依赖EVM，使其成为开发人员的首选选择。相比之下，Cosmos使用其自己的软件Cosmwasm运行，这种软件的采用率较慢。

Sei initially set out to provide dual support for both EVM and CosmWasm, aiming to offer flexibility. However, according to Su, this dual architecture created “unnecessary overhead in the codebase and complicated debugging and testing.”

SEI最初着手为EVM和COSMWASM提供双重支持，旨在提供灵活性。但是，根据SU的说法，这种双重体系结构创建了“在代码库中不必要的开销和复杂的调试和测试”。

Data from Sei Labs shows that new users overwhelmingly prefer EVM over CosmWasm, further justifying the proposed shift.

SEI实验室的数据表明，新用户绝大多数更喜欢EVM而不是宇宙，这进一步证明了拟议的班次是合理的。

“The goal is to make it clear that we are focused on building the best possible chain for the EVM ecosystem,” Su added.

Su补充说：“目的是清楚地表明，我们专注于为EVM生态系统建立最佳的链条。”

The Impact on Cosmos and DeFi Growth

对宇宙和Defi增长的影响

If the proposal is approved, it could deal a blow to CosmWasm’s adoption. However, Barry Plunkett, co-CEO of Interchain Labs, pointed out that Sei would still retain some Cosmos features, such as staking and governance.

如果该提案获得批准，则可能会对宇宙的采用造成打击。然而，链链实验室的联合首席执行官巴里·普伦凯特（Barry Plunkett）指出，SEI仍将保留一些宇宙特征，例如占有和治理。

“Even if they cut support for CosmWasm, they are still a Cosmos-based chain in terms of the commoncoin initiative and the close collaboration with the broader Cosmos ecosystem,” Plunkett stated.

Plunkett表示：“即使他们削减了对宇宙的支持，就普通币倡议和与更广泛的宇宙生态系统的密切合作而言，它们仍然是基于宇宙的连锁店。”

Sei’s growth trajectory has been swift since its 2023 launch. Total deposits in DeFi apps on the network recently hit an all-time high of $1 billion, ranking it as the 15th largest blockchain by total value locked, according to DefiLlama. This growth was particularly driven by the introduction of EVM support in July 2024, which attracted a larger pool of developers and investors.

自2023年推出以来，SEI的增长轨迹一直很快。根据Defillama的数据，该网络上的Defi应用程序中的总存款最近达到了10亿美元的历史最高点，将其排名为第15大区块链按总价值锁定。该增长尤其是由于2024年7月引入EVM支持的推动，这吸引了更多的开发商和投资者。

Community Reaction and Next Steps

社区反应和下一步

The proposal has sparked debate within the Sei community. While some see it as a necessary step to enhance usability and adoption, others worry about the potential loss of flexibility.

该提案引发了SEI社区中的辩论。尽管有些人将其视为增强可用性和采用的必要步骤，但另一些人则担心潜在的灵活性丧失。

To address these concerns and collect feedback from developers and users, the nonprofit Sei Foundation will host a community call on May 14 to discuss the proposal in detail.

为了解决这些问题并收集开发人员和用户的反馈，非营利性SEI基金会将于5月14日举办社区电话，以详细讨论该提案。

The outcome of this decision could set a precedent for other blockchains navigating the trade-offs between flexibility and simplicity. As the blockchain space continues to evolve, Sei’s pivot to Ethereum could serve as a case study in strategic adaptation.

这一决定的结果可能为其他区块链带来了一个先例，该区块链在灵活性和简单性之间导致了权衡。随着区块链空间的不断发展，SEI对以太坊的枢纽可以作为战略适应的案例研究。