罗斯·乌尔布里希特（Ross Ulbricht

罗斯·乌尔布里希特（Ross Ulbricht）或有接触钱包的人只是意外地削减了派遣给他的普通币的价格，同时试图在Raydium上提供流动性。

A series of technical errors in cryptocurrency trading led to a $12 million loss for wallets linked to former Silk Road founder Ross Ulbricht, according to Arkham Intelligence.

根据Arkham Intelligence的说法，与前丝绸之路创始人罗斯·乌尔布里希特（Ross Ulbricht）有关的钱包的一系列技术错误导致了1200万美元的损失。

The wallets, which were verified by the crypto analysis firm as being listed on the FreeRoss.org donation site, initially held 50% of the total supply of ROSS tokens.

该钱包已由加密分析公司（Crypto Analysis）验证为在Freeross.org捐赠现场上市，最初占Ross令牌总供应量的50％。

These tokens were created as a show of support for Ulbricht following his release from prison, where he had served 11 years for money laundering and drug trafficking conspiracies.

这些令牌是为了支持Ulbricht从监狱获释后的支持，在那里他因洗钱和贩毒的阴谋而服役11年。

The first error occurred when the wallet controller attempted to provide liquidity on the Raydium platform. Instead of creating a Concentrated Liquidity Market Maker (CLMM) pool, which allows traders to set specific prices, they mistakenly set up a Constant-Product Market Maker (CPMM) pool.

当钱包控制器试图在Raydium平台上提供流动性时，就会发生第一个错误。他们没有创建集中的流动性营销商（CLMM）池，该池允许交易者设定特定的价格，而是错误地建立了恒定产品的营销商（CPMM）池。

This initial mistake resulted in approximately 5% of the ROSS token supply being made available at prices far below market value. A Maximal Extractable Value (MEV) bot quickly identified the opportunity and purchased 398.6 million tokens, worth about $1.5 million at regular market prices, for just $556.

最初的错误导致大约5％的罗斯令牌供应以远低于市场价值的价格提供。最大的可提取价值（MEV）机器人迅速确定了这一机会，并购买了3.986亿个代币，价值约150万美元，以常规市场价格为150万美元，仅为556美元。

The situation worsened when the wallet controller made a second attempt to add single-sided liquidity. This subsequent error led to roughly 35% more of the total ROSS supply being sold at unfavorable prices. The same MEV bot capitalized on this mistake, selling the acquired tokens for 2,669 SOL (approximately $643,000).

当钱包控制器第二次尝试增加单面流动性时，情况恶化了。随后的错误导致以不利的价格出售的Ross总供应量大约增加了35％。同样的MEV机器人在此错误上大写了，以2,669 SOL（约合643,000美元）出售了被收购的令牌。

The combined errors resulted in a dramatic 90% price drop for the ROSS token, with values falling from $0.039 SOL to $0.0036 SOL per token within just two hours.

合并的错误导致罗斯令牌的价格下降了90％，价值从0.039美元的SOL下降到每种令牌的0.0036元溶胶。

The trading volume for ROSS tokens showed increased activity following the incident, reaching $508,270 after a 24% surge in trading activity. This suggests ongoing market interest despite the price volatility.

事件发生后，罗斯令牌的交易量显示出活动的增加，在交易活动激增24％后达到508,270美元。这表明尽管价格波动，但仍在进行市场兴趣。

Currently, the Ulbricht-linked wallets retain approximately 10% of the total ROSS token supply, valued at around $200,000. This represents a substantial decrease from their initial 50% holding.

目前，与Ulbricht相关的钱包保留了大约10％的Ross令牌供应量，价值约20万美元。这与最初的50％持有相比大幅下降。

The ROSS token has shown remarkable recovery since the incident. Within 24 hours of the price crash, the token experienced a 735% increase in value, reaching a trading price of $0.0104.

自事件发生以来，罗斯令牌已显示出了显着的康复。在价格崩溃后的24小时内，令牌价值增加了​​735％，达到了0.0104美元的交易价格。

The trading volume has also expanded considerably, reaching $14.8 million as investors responded to the market movement.

交易量也大大增加了，随着投资者对市场的反应，交易量达到1480万美元。

The MEV bot’s successful exploitation of the situation demonstrates the automated nature of cryptocurrency markets, where programs constantly scan for trading opportunities and can execute transactions instantly when they identify pricing discrepancies.

MEV机器人对这种情况的成功开发表明了加密货币市场的自动性质，该计划不断扫描交易机会，并在确定定价差异时可以立即执行交易。

This incident highlights the technical complexities involved in cryptocurrency trading, particularly in managing liquidity pools and understanding different market-making mechanisms.

该事件突出了加密货币交易所涉及的技术复杂性，尤其是在管理流动性池和了解不同的营销机制方面。

The error occurred specifically on the Raydium platform, a decentralized exchange operating on the Solana blockchain, which offers different types of liquidity pools for traders.

该错误发生在Raydium Platform上，Raydium Platform是在Solana区块链上运行的分散交换，该交易链为交易者提供了不同类型的流动性池。

The mistake shows how critical it is to understand the distinction between different types of liquidity pools – CPMM and CLMM – as they operate under different pricing mechanisms and can lead to vastly different trading outcomes.

错误表明，了解不同类型的流动性池（CPMM和CLMM）之间的区别是多么关键，因为它们在不同的定价机制下运行，并可能导致截然不同的交易成果。

The incident has drawn attention from the cryptocurrency community, serving as a reminder of the importance of technical knowledge in digital asset trading.

该事件引起了加密货币社区的关注，这提醒了技术知识在数字资产交易中的重要性。