Ozone Chain和Cellframe：哪种抗量子区块链更好？

在当今的区块链网络中，必须改进传统的密码方法，以防御能够快速解决问题的量子计算机

In the realm of blockchain technology, the threat posed by quantum computers to traditional cryptographic methods is a pressing concern. To preempt this vulnerability, quantum-resistant blockchain technology is being developed to safeguard distributed ledger systems.

在区块链技术领域，量子计算机对传统密码方法构成的威胁是一个紧迫的问题。为了预防这一漏洞，正在开发抗量子区块链技术来保护分布式账本系统。

This emerging class of blockchains aims to protect sensitive transaction details from being compromised by malicious actors utilizing quantum computers. Here, we present an overview of two leading quantum-proof blockchain platforms, each boasting unique strengths in this competitive landscape. Their ability to withstand quantum attacks while maintaining high throughput and scalability will play a crucial role in the future of distributed ledgers.

这种新兴的区块链旨在保护敏感的交易细节免遭恶意行为者利用量子计算机的损害。在这里，我们概述了两个领先的量子证明区块链平台，每个平台在这个竞争格局中都拥有独特的优势。它们抵御量子攻击同时保持高吞吐量和可扩展性的能力将在分布式账本的未来中发挥至关重要的作用。

Introducing Ozone Chain (OZO) and Cellframe

臭氧链 (OZO) 和 Cellframe 简介

In the arena of quantum-resistant blockchains, Ozone Chain and Cellframe stand out with their distinct approaches to security, scalability, and ecosystem development.

在抗量子区块链领域，Ozone Chain 和 Cellframe 以其独特的安全性、可扩展性和生态系统开发方法脱颖而出。

Security: Ozone Chain employs advanced post-quantum cryptography and quantum random number generation to safeguard data against quantum computing threats. In contrast, Cellframe utilizes quantum-resistant algorithms to secure data transmission and storage.

安全性：Ozone Chain采用先进的后量子密码学和量子随机数生成技术来保护数据免受量子计算威胁。相比之下，Cellframe 利用抗量子算法来保护数据传输和存储。

Ozone Chain's独自のconsensual mechanism contributes to high transaction throughput and scalability, while maintaining strong security as performance increases. On the other hand, Cell

Ozone Chain的独自の共识机制有助于实现高交易吞吐量和可扩展性，同时随着性能的提高保持强大的安全性。另一方面，细胞