![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
加密货币新闻
GOP Tax Plan Would Shower Benefits on the Wealthy While Saddling the Nation With Debt
2025/01/18 04:05
Biden’s Tax Agenda: A Balanced Approach to Cutting Costs and Delivering Benefits
January 17, 2023
President Biden’s tax agenda aims to provide significant benefits to families earning less than $400,000 while minimizing the impact on the federal deficit. This approach contrasts sharply with the massive extension of the Trump-era tax cuts proposed by Congressional Republicans, which would primarily benefit wealthy individuals and businesses.
According to a recent analysis by the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy (ITEP), extending the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) would direct more than two-thirds of the benefits to the richest 20 percent of households. A family making $20,000 a year would receive a modest tax cut of a hundred dollars, while a millionaire would receive tens of thousands.
This approach is designed to offer small tax cuts to working families as political cover while delivering massive benefits to the wealthiest Americans — at the cost of a ballooning federal deficit.
The simplest and most equitable way to reduce the deficit impact of the Republican tax plan would be to scale back tax cuts for wealthy individuals and corporations. The Treasury Department recently reported that limiting tax breaks to families earning less than $400,000 would cut the proposal’s cost by more than half.
However, Republican lawmakers have shown little interest in this practical and reasonable approach.
Instead, they have proposed measures such as repealing green manufacturing credits from the Inflation Reduction Act — a move that would offset only a fraction of the cost of their tax cuts for the wealthy and would come at the expense of American manufacturing jobs. Notably, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, a vocal opponent of these credits, celebrated a $2 billion solar plant in her district that was built with the help of these incentives.
If lawmakers really do attempt to offset the huge costs of these tax cuts, they will be forced to turn to spending cuts or tax increases of such magnitude and such regressive impact that they were unimaginable before this Congress.
Republican lawmakers recently prepared a document including additional potential revenue raisers. These proposals range from repealing tax-advantaged private activity bonds, which are often used in the construction of ports and airports, to taxing scholarship tuition of college students.
Most of these proposals would be token gestures, however, raising only tens of billions of dollars and barely making a dent in the $5.5 trillion cost of extending the TCJA.
President-elect Trump has also touted plans to increase tariffs to 20 percent across the board and 60 percent for imports from China. It is impossible to say what any new tariffs would actually look like or how much revenue these will raise as his more recent tariff proposals have varied from full across-the-board 20 percent tariffs on all imported goods to targeted tariffs for territorial expansion. To the extent that tariffs raise revenue, though, they are largely paid for by consumers. This would amount to a tax increase on regular families.
If Republican lawmakers were serious about deficit-neutral tax reform, they would focus on increasing taxes for the ultra-wealthy and large corporations. A recent report from the Congressional Budget Office laid out policy options that – combined with a limited approach to extending the 2017 tax law – could offset much of the revenue loss.
Raising the corporate tax rate by just 1 percent could generate over $100 billion, for example. Taxing U.S. corporations’ foreign income at the domestic rate would yield more than $300 billion. Closing loopholes, such as the Gingrich-Edwards loophole that allows high-income business owners to avoid certain taxes, could raise over $400 billion.
Ultimately, these measures demonstrate that a more equitable and fiscally responsible tax package is possible. The absence of such proposals in the Republican plan reveals their true priority: delivering enormous tax cuts to the wealthiest Americans while average working families receive crumbs.
免责声明:info@kdj.com
所提供的信息并非交易建议。根据本文提供的信息进行的任何投资,kdj.com不承担任何责任。加密货币具有高波动性,强烈建议您深入研究后,谨慎投资!
如您认为本网站上使用的内容侵犯了您的版权,请立即联系我们(info@kdj.com),我们将及时删除。
-
- 稀有发现:2P硬币错误价值1,000英镑!
- 2025-07-01 14:30:12
- 寻找具有“新彭斯”的1983年2p硬币 - 值得一提!了解如何发现这个有价值的错误并可能现金。
-
-
- 德国银行,加密货币交易和FOMO:一个新时代?
- 2025-07-01 14:35:12
- 在客户需求和监管变化的推动下,德国银行正在加热加密交易。 FOMO踢了吗?让我们潜水。
-
-
- ETF批准,加密和机构投资:新时代?
- 2025-07-01 15:10:12
- 探索潜在的Altcoin ETF批准对加密货币的机构投资的影响,重点是Solana和更广泛的市场趋势。
-
- 比特币突破进入?七月的模式暗示了历史性的集会!
- 2025-07-01 14:50:12
- 比特币正在准备重大突破吗? 7月的历史模式和当前的市场动态表明了潜在的集会。深入分析!
-
-
- Pengu价格集会是由鲸鱼购买的:即将突破吗?
- 2025-07-01 15:15:12
- Pengu正在经历一场价格集会,这是由大量鲸鱼购买和积极的市场情绪驱动的。它会破坏$ 0.015的电阻吗?
-
- 康涅狄格州的加密诗:禁止数字资产投资
- 2025-07-01 15:30:12
- 康涅狄格州雄心勃勃的趋势,禁止国家对数字资产的投资。这是谨慎还是错过的机会的迹象?