![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Starkware的创新比特币验证器将区块链交易验证带到移动设备,提供简化的,可访问的解决方案。
Bitcoin Verifier on Mobile: StarkWare's ZK Proof Revolutionizes Access
手机上的比特币验证器:Starkware的ZK证明革新访问
Imagine verifying Bitcoin transactions directly on your phone. StarkWare, the zero-knowledge (ZK) cryptography gurus, just made that a reality. Their 1MB proof of the Bitcoin ledger lets you ditch the hefty full node infrastructure and verify transactions in under 100 milliseconds. That’s faster than ordering a coffee!
想象一下,直接在手机上验证比特币交易。 Starkware,零知识(ZK)加密大师,只是使这一现实成为现实。他们的1MB比特币分类帐的证明使您可以放弃大量的完整节点基础架构,并在100毫秒以下验证交易。这比点咖啡快!
Mobile Bitcoin Verification Enters the ZK Era
移动比特币验证进入ZK时代
This isn't just some tech demo; it's a potential game-changer. StarkWare's proof packs every Bitcoin block header from the genesis block to today, skipping the 680+ gigabytes of transaction data but keeping crucial stuff like timestamps and block sizes. Think of it as Simplified Payment Verification (SPV) on steroids, bringing Bitcoin to anyone with a smartphone, regardless of their tech skills or available resources.
这不仅仅是一些技术演示;这是一个潜在的改变游戏规则的人。 Starkware的证明从Genesis Block到今天都包装了每个比特币块标头,跳过了680多GB的交易数据,但保留了关键的内容,例如时间戳和块尺寸。将其视为类固醇上的简化付款验证(SPV),将比特币带给拥有智能手机的任何人,无论其技术技能或可用资源如何。
A Decentralization Safeguard or a New Risk?
权力保障或新风险?
With the Bitcoin ledger ballooning thanks to inscriptions and NFTs, node centralization is a growing concern. StarkWare's mobile verifier steps in as a counterweight, democratizing access to Bitcoin's consensus by shrinking validation down to a tiny 1MB proof. It’s like Marie Kondo-ing the blockchain – keeping only what sparks joy (or, you know, essential data).
借助铭文和NFTS,比特币分类帐的气球,节点集中化是一个日益关注的问题。 Starkware的移动验证者成为一种配重,通过将验证缩减为1MB的证明,使对比特币达成共识的访问使人变得民主化。就像玛丽·康多(Marie Kondo-ing)的区块链一样 - 仅保留引起欢乐的东西(或者,您知道,基本数据)。
Knots vs Core: The Node Wars Intensify
结与核心:节点战争加剧
Timing is everything, and this launch is spot-on. Bitcoin Core 30's upcoming removal of the OP_Return data cap has some node operators jumping ship to Bitcoin Knots, an alternative client with customizable data thresholds. As OP_Return usage explodes, StarkWare’s proof could become essential for users who want to validate transactions without downloading petabytes of cat pictures and spam. Bitcoin Knots are making headway too, composing nearly 20% of the Bitcoin network, compared to just 1% at the end of 2024.
时机就是一切,此发射是斑点。比特币核心30即将删除OP_Return数据上限的一些节点操作员将船跳到比特币结,这是一个具有可自定义数据阈值的替代客户端。随着OP_RETURN的使用爆炸,Starkware的证明对于想要在不下载猫图片和垃圾邮件的情况下验证交易的用户可能是必不可少的。比特币结也取得了进展,构成了比特币网络的近20%,而到2024年底仅1%。
My Take: A Step in the Right Direction
我的看法:朝正确的方向迈出一步
Look, I'm no crypto prophet, but this feels significant. Compressing over a decade of Bitcoin history into something usable on a smartphone is seriously impressive. As Bitcoin grapples with scaling, spam, and node centralization, these lightweight tools could be key to preserving the ethos of permissionless access. The rise of Bitcoin Knots as a viable alternative client also speaks volumes about the community's desire for customizable solutions. It's not about choosing sides; it's about empowering users with options.
看,我不是加密先知,但这很重要。将十年的比特币历史记录到智能手机上可用的东西上是令人印象深刻的。随着比特币与缩放,垃圾邮件和节点集中化的努力,这些轻巧的工具可能是保持无许可访问精神的关键。比特币结的兴起作为可行的替代客户,还谈到了社区对可定制解决方案的渴望。这不是选择各个方面;这是关于使用户使用选项的能力。
So, will StarkWare's mobile verifier save Bitcoin? Maybe not single-handedly. But it's a darn good start. And who knows, maybe one day we'll all be running Bitcoin nodes on our smartwatches. A guy can dream, right?
那么,Starkware的移动验证者会节省比特币吗?也许不是单枪匹马。但这是一个良好的开始。谁知道,也许有一天我们都会在智能手表上运行比特币节点。一个人可以做梦,对吗?
免责声明:info@kdj.com
所提供的信息并非交易建议。根据本文提供的信息进行的任何投资,kdj.com不承担任何责任。加密货币具有高波动性,强烈建议您深入研究后,谨慎投资!
如您认为本网站上使用的内容侵犯了您的版权,请立即联系我们(info@kdj.com),我们将及时删除。
-
-
-
-
-
-
- 比特币,以太坊和Shiba Inu:在2025年浏览加密货币景观
- 2025-09-15 08:10:00
- 查看了围绕比特币,以太坊和什叶派INU的当前趋势,分析了这些加密货币的市场运动,主要见解和未来前景。
-
-
-
- Dogecoin在2025年:准备好一个月?
- 2025-09-15 07:59:44
- Dogecoin的眼睛在2025年的ETF发射和分析师乐观态度中盈利。历史趋势和市场情绪是否会统计到Doge?