![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
卢克·达什吉(Luke Dashjr)的硬福克(Hardfork)抗击非法内容的建议引发了关于比特币的核心原则和审查制度抵抗的激烈辩论。
Hold on to your hats, folks! The Bitcoin world is buzzing with a spicy new debate surrounding a potential hardfork. At the center of it all? None other than Luke Dashjr, a Bitcoin Knots maintainer, and a proposal that's got everyone talking: tackling illegal content on the blockchain.
抓住你的帽子,伙计们!比特币界正在嗡嗡作响,围绕着潜在的硬币进行了辛辣的新辩论。在这一切的中心?除了比特币结的维护者卢克·达什(Luke Dashjr),还有一个让每个人都在谈论的建议:在区块链上解决非法内容。
The Alleged Hardfork Proposal: A Quick Recap
所谓的Hardfork提案:快速回顾
So, what's the deal? Leaked messages suggest Dashjr is mulling over a hardfork to create a trusted multisig committee. This committee would have the power to retroactively alter the Bitcoin blockchain, specifically targeting and removing illegal content, like CSAM. The goal is noble, but the implications? Well, that's where things get interesting.
那么,有什么交易?泄漏的消息表明,达什吉(Dashjr)正在仔细考虑一个硬福克(Hardfork),以建立一个值得信赖的Multisig委员会。该委员会将有权追溯改变比特币区块链,特别针对和删除非法内容,例如CSAM。目标是崇高的,但是含义?好吧,这就是事情变得有趣的地方。
Bitcoin Knots vs. Bitcoin Core: A Longstanding Feud
比特币结与比特币核心:长期的争执
This isn't just a random idea popping up out of nowhere. There's a history here. The disagreement stems from the differing philosophies between Bitcoin Knots and Bitcoin Core. Bitcoin Knots folks, Dashjr included, believe that non-monetary data (aka "spam") has no business clogging up the Bitcoin network. They've even implemented filters to block transactions containing such data from entering a node’s mempool.
这不仅仅是一个随机的想法。这里有历史。分歧源于比特币结和比特币核心之间的不同哲学。比特币结(包括Dashjr)的比特币结,认为非货币数据(又称“垃圾邮件”)没有业务堵塞比特币网络。他们甚至实施了过滤器,以阻止包含此类数据输入节点的Mempool的交易。
The Multisig Committee: Savior or Slippery Slope?
Multisig委员会:救主还是滑坡?
Dashjr's proposal involves a selected group reviewing transactions with CSAM and replacing the data with zero-knowledge proofs. This would allow node operators to remove the content while keeping the transactions valid. Dashjr himself acknowledges that this plan would require a consensus change and a Bitcoin hardfork, stating that "Right now the only options would be Bitcoin dies or we have to trust someone."
DASHJR的建议涉及选择的小组审查CSAM的交易,并用零知识证明替换数据。这将使节点运算符在保持交易有效的同时删除内容。 Dashjr本人承认,该计划将需要更改共识和比特币硬币,并指出:“现在唯一的选择是比特币死亡,否则我们必须信任某人。”
Why the Fuss? Implications and Concerns
为什么大惊小怪?含义和关注
Here's where the debate gets heated. Critics argue that this proposal could compromise Bitcoin's fundamental principle of being permissionless and censorship-resistant. Giving a committee the power to alter blockchain data could open the floodgates to wider censorship and even regulatory controls, like KYC and AML requirements. It's a classic "slippery slope" argument.
这是辩论得到加剧的地方。批评者认为,这项提议可能会损害比特币的基本原则,即无权予以审查。赋予委员会更改区块链数据的权力可以为更广泛的审查制度,甚至是法规控制,例如KYC和AML要求。这是一个经典的“滑坡”论点。
Dashjr's Response: Denial!
Dashjr的回应:否认!
Adding fuel to the fire, when asked for comment, Dashjr reportedly rejected the reports, calling them "completely unfounded lies?" No further details were provided, leaving the crypto community to speculate and debate.
据报道,当被要求发表评论时,在大火中增加了燃料,据报道拒绝了这些报告,称它们“完全没有根据?”没有提供其他细节,使加密货币社区推测和辩论。
The Big Question: Balancing Act
大问题:平衡行为
The core issue remains: How do we deal with illegal content on Bitcoin while preserving its core values? Policymakers, miners, and node operators are grappling with balancing network governance, legal compliance, and Bitcoin's censorship-resistant design. It's a tough nut to crack.
核心问题仍然存在:我们如何在保留其核心价值的同时处理比特币上的非法内容?决策者,矿工和节点运营商正在努力解决平衡网络治理,法律合规性和比特币的耐心设计。这是一个很难破裂的坚果。
My Two Satoshis
我的两个satoshis
While the intent behind combating CSAM is undeniably commendable, the proposed hardfork raises serious concerns about the future of Bitcoin's decentralization. History has taught us that once a door to censorship is opened, it's difficult to close. Maybe there are other ways to resolve this issue.
虽然无可否认地值得赞扬与CSAM作斗争的意图,但拟议中的硬构成对比特币权力下放的未来引起了严重的关注。历史告诉我们,一旦打开了审查之门,就很难关闭。也许还有其他方法可以解决此问题。
The Debate Rages On...
辩论在...
Whether you're a Bitcoin maximalist or a curious onlooker, this debate is worth paying attention to. It touches upon the very soul of Bitcoin and its role in a world increasingly concerned with censorship and control. This whole situation is pretty wild, right? Makes you wonder what's next in the ever-evolving world of crypto!
无论您是比特币的最大主义者还是好奇的旁观者,这场辩论都值得关注。它涉及比特币的灵魂及其在越来越关注审查制度和控制的世界中的作用。整个情况非常疯狂,对吗?让您想知道在不断发展的加密世界中的下一步!
免责声明:info@kdj.com
所提供的信息并非交易建议。根据本文提供的信息进行的任何投资,kdj.com不承担任何责任。加密货币具有高波动性,强烈建议您深入研究后,谨慎投资!
如您认为本网站上使用的内容侵犯了您的版权,请立即联系我们(info@kdj.com),我们将及时删除。
-
-
- Swift测试与Linea的链上消息:全球金融的新时代?
- 2025-09-27 09:28:18
- Swift和Linea正在通过链接消息和Stablecoins链接彻底改变全球交易。发现这种合作的含义。
-
-
-
- 比特币,黄金,股票:在2025年浏览投资变化的沙子
- 2025-09-27 09:00:56
- 解开比特币,黄金和股票的最新趋势。发现经济数据,监管转变和新兴技术如何重塑投资策略。
-
-
-
-