比特币核心，结和统计数据：节点战争加热！

比特币节点景观越来越辣！我们正在研究比特币核心和打结之间的辩论，围绕节点统计的戏剧以及对比特币未来的影响。

Bitcoin Core, Knots, and Stats: A Node War Heats Up!

比特币核心，结和统计数据：节点战争加热！

Hold on to your hats, Bitcoin enthusiasts! The world of Bitcoin nodes is experiencing some serious turbulence. We're seeing heated debates, accusations of statistical manipulation, and even threats of forked software. Buckle up as we untangle the drama surrounding Bitcoin Core, Knots, and the crucial statistics that define the network's landscape.

抓住帽子，比特币爱好者！比特币节点的世界正在经历严重的动荡。我们看到了激烈的辩论，统计操纵的指控，甚至是分叉软件的威胁。当我们解开围绕比特币核心，结的戏剧性以及定义网络景观的关键统计数据时。

The Core vs. Knots Showdown

核心与结对决

For those new to the game, Bitcoin Core remains the dominant Bitcoin node software. However, Knots, a Core alternative championed by Luke Dashjr, has been steadily gaining traction, fueled by ideological differences and a desire for stricter default policies.

对于那些新的游戏的人，比特币核心仍然是主要的比特币节点软件。然而，由卢克·达什（Luke Dashjr）倡导的核心替代方案一直在稳步获得关注，这是由于意识形态上的差异和对​​更严格的默认政策的渴望所吸引的。

Statistical Skirmishes: Are Knots Nodes Being Overcounted?

统计小规模冲突：结节点是否过分？

Recently, accusations flew regarding the accuracy of Knots node statistics. Bitcoin Core developers initially claimed that a significant portion of Knots nodes were being double-counted, suggesting a “sybil attack” was inflating their numbers. SuperTestnet fueled this skepticism, alleging Knots’ real dominance might be lower than reported.

最近，指控因结节点统计数据的准确性而飞逝。比特币核心开发人员最初声称，有很大一部分的结节点被双重计数，这表明“ Sybil攻击”正在夸大其数量。 Supertestnet引起了这种怀疑，指控结的真正统治力可能低于报道。

However, this claim quickly unraveled. Start9, a Bitcoin hardware company, stepped in, explaining that many of the suspected “fake” nodes were actually legitimate nodes from their storefront. SuperTestnet retracted much of his original statement, and CalleBTC deleted a celebratory post based on the dubious stats. It seems the initial claims were a bit premature, showcasing the challenges of accurately tracking node distribution.

但是，这一说法很快就解开了。比特币硬件公司Start9介入，解释说，许多可疑的“假”节点实际上是店面的合法节点。 Supertestnet缩回了他的大部分原始声明，Callebtc根据可疑统计数据删除了庆祝帖子。似乎最初的主张还为时过早，展示了准确跟踪节点分布的挑战。

The OP_RETURN Uproar: Data Storage and the Debate Over "Spam"

OP_Return Uproar：数据存储和“垃圾邮件”的辩论

The controversy doesn't end there. Bitcoin Core's upcoming v30 release, which loosens data storage limitations by removing the 80-byte cap on OP_RETURN payloads, has ignited a firestorm. The Knots community, led by Bitcoin Mechanic, is raising concerns that this change could lead to the hosting and relaying of illegal content, like pornography, by unsuspecting node operators. They argue that this 1,200X increase is a terrible idea.

争议并没有结束。 Bitcoin Core即将发布的V30发行版，通过删除OP_Return有效载荷上的80字节帽来放松数据存储限制，并点燃了火灾。由比特币机械师领导的结社区正在引起人们的担忧，即这种变化可能会导致通过毫无戒心的节点操作员托管和传达非法内容，例如色情内容。他们认为，这种增加1200倍是一个可怕的想法。

Bitcoin Mechanic has been vocal about the potential for malicious content, including viruses and malware, to proliferate across nodes. The Knots community plans to retain the old data cap, viewing the change as a morally indefensible compromise. This highlights a fundamental difference in philosophy: Bitcoin Core aims to accommodate economic demand, even for non-financial data, while Knots prioritizes stricter policies to prevent potential misuse.

比特币机械师一直在发声恶意含量（包括病毒和恶意软件）跨节点增殖的潜力。结婚社区计划保留旧数据上限，将变化视为道德上无可辩驳的妥协。这凸显了哲学上的根本差异：比特币核心旨在适应经济需求，即使是非金融数据，而结对防止潜在滥用的更严格的政策优先考虑。

The Threat of a Fork: Censorship Resistance and Base-Layer Neutrality

叉子的威胁：抵抗和基层中立性

Adding fuel to the fire, Leonidas, a prominent figure in the Bitcoin Ordinals movement, has threatened to fund an alternative version of Bitcoin Core if it tightens policy rules in a way that harms Ordinals and Runes transactions. He argues that the Ordinals/Runes economy has contributed significantly to Bitcoin's security through transaction fees and insists on base-layer neutrality.

在大火中增加了燃料，列昂尼达斯（Leonidas）是比特币序列运动中的杰出人物，威胁要为比特币核心的替代版本提供资金，如果它以损害序列和符合交易的方式加强政策规则。他认为，序数/符文经济通过交易费用为比特币的安全做出了重大贡献，并坚持基本层中立性。

This threat underscores the tension between different factions within the Bitcoin community and the importance of user choice. Adam Back, Blockstream CEO, rightly points out that Bitcoin is owned by humanity, and developers are stewards who need consensus to make material changes. The market is already “voting” with its node software, as Knots has experienced a surge in popularity amid the relay-policy fight.

这种威胁强调了比特币社区内不同派系之间的张力与用户选择的重要性。 Blockstream首席执行官Adam Back正确地指出，比特币是人类拥有的，开发人员是需要共识才能进行重大更改的管家。市场已经通过其节点软件进行“投票”，因为在接力赛战斗中，调子在流行中经历了流行。

My Two Satoshis

我的两个satoshis

The drama surrounding Bitcoin Core, Knots, and node statistics highlights the ongoing evolution of Bitcoin. While the initial accusations of statistical manipulation against Knots appear to have been overstated, the debate over data storage limits and censorship resistance is far from over. It's crucial for the community to engage in open and honest dialogue to find solutions that balance innovation with security and ethical considerations.

围绕比特币核心，结和节点统计数据的戏剧突出了比特币的持续发展。虽然对结统计操作的最初指控似乎已经夸大了，但有关数据存储限制和审查制度抵抗的争论还远远没有结束。对于社区而言，进行开放和诚实的对话至关重要，以找到平衡创新与安全和道德考虑的解决方案。

Ultimately, the beauty of Bitcoin lies in its decentralized nature. Users have the power to choose the software that aligns with their values and priorities. Whether you're a Core maximalist, a Knots enthusiast, or somewhere in between, remember to stay informed, question assumptions, and contribute to the ongoing conversation. After all, Bitcoin is a work in progress, and its future depends on the collective wisdom of its community.

最终，比特币的美丽在于其分散的本质。用户有权选择与其价值和优先级保持一致的软件。无论您是核心的最大主义者，一个结的爱好者还是介于两者之间的某个地方，都记得保持知情，质疑假设并为正在进行的对话做出贡献。毕竟，比特币是一项正在进行的工作，其未来取决于其社区的集体智慧。

So, What's Next?

那么，下一步是什么？

Keep an eye on the Bitcoin Core v30 release and the ongoing debate surrounding data storage limits. The choices node operators make will shape the future of the network. And remember, whether you're crunching numbers or debating policy, don't forget to HODL... your sense of humor, that is!

密切关注比特币核心V30版本以及围绕数据存储限制的持续辩论。选择节点运算符的选择将影响网络的未来。请记住，无论您是处理数字还是辩论政策，都不要忘记霍德（Hodl）...您的幽默感，就是这样！