比特币核心，结和极大的分歧：纽约的心态

导航比特币景观：核心与结，OP_Return Wars和节点计数争议。是真正的竞争还是在加密货币中的另一天？

The Bitcoin world is never short on drama, especially when it comes to the ongoing debate between Bitcoin Core and Knots. From node counts to data storage, disagreements are brewing.

比特币世界从来都不是戏剧性的，尤其是在比特币核心和打结之间正在进行的辩论方面。从节点计数到数据存储，分歧正在酝酿中。

The Core vs. Knots Showdown: What's the Beef?

核心与结对决：什么是牛肉？

At the heart of the matter is a fundamental difference in philosophy. Bitcoin Core, the dominant software, is facing challenges from Knots, a fork led by Bitcoin Mechanic. The central clash revolves around Core's v30 update and its approach to data storage, specifically the OP_RETURN datacarrier limit.

问题的核心是哲学上的根本差异。优势软件比特币核心面临着由比特币机械师领导的叉子的挑战。中央冲突围绕Core的V30更新及其数据存储的方法，特别是OP_RET_RETURN DATACARRIER限制。

The OP_RETURN War: Data Storage or Data Spam?

OP_RETURN WAR：数据存储还是数据垃圾邮件？

Core v30 plans to increase the mempool's default datacarrier limit for OP_RETURN significantly. Core proponents argue arbitrary data storage is inevitable. Knots, however, sees this as opening the floodgates to irrelevant data storage, potentially harming Bitcoin's core purpose. They view the current data cap as a deterrent, a fence against trespassing, even if not foolproof. Core views this as a game of whack-a-mole.

Core V30计划大大增加Mempool的默认数据载波限制。核心支持者认为，任意数据存储是不可避免的。然而，结认为这是为数据存储无关的闸门，可能会损害比特币的核心目的。他们将当前的数据上限视为威慑力，即使不是万无一失的围栏，也可以防止侵入。核心将其视为whack-a-mole的游戏。

Node Count Nonsense: Who's Inflating What?

节点胡说八道：谁在夸大什么？

Then there's the kerfuffle over node counts. Accusations flew about Knots nodes being

然后是节点计数上的kerfuffle。指控飞行了结节点