![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Articles d’actualité sur les crypto-monnaies
福布斯严厉的“加密货币僵尸”文章引发轩然大波,促使行业领袖进行辩护
Mar 28, 2024 at 09:06 pm
Forbes' Scathing 'Crypto Zombies' Article Ignites Uproar, Sparks Defense from Industry Leaders
A recent Forbes article has sparked a storm of controversy within the cryptocurrency sector, painting a grim picture of over two dozen blockchain networks as "crypto zombies" lacking significant usage, development, and real-world applications. The article's scathing analysis has drawn sharp criticism from several industry leaders, who have rallied to defend their respective projects against the allegations.
Forbes' Methodology and Targeted Projects
Forbes' analysis scrutinized the top 50 blockchain networks, evaluating them based on four key metrics: monthly active developers, fees generated over the past year, total value locked, and the market cap-to-fees ratio. The article concluded that over 20 crypto projects with market caps exceeding $1 billion are sustained solely by speculation, offering minimal value or utility.
Among the projects targeted by Forbes were some of the most prominent names in the industry, including XRP, Cardano, Stellar, Stacks, Bitcoin Cash, Litecoin, Fantom, Algorand, Tezos, and EOS. Collectively, these projects command a market capitalization of approximately $59.3 billion.
Industry Leaders Counter Attack
The allegations leveled by Forbes have been met with swift and vehement rebuttals from leaders within the respective communities of the targeted projects. Charles Hoskinson, the founder of Cardano, took to Twitter to dismiss the "zombie" comparison, playfully suggesting that the projects included in the article possess superior intelligence.
Hoskinson's sentiment was echoed by proponents of XRP, who derided the article's author and the outlet. Panos Mekras, founder of XRPL-based Anodos Finance, denounced the piece as "nonsense and misinformation," questioning the author's research and understanding of the industry.
Pro-XRP crypto lawyer Bill Morgan raised concerns over the SEC's pursuit of Ripple if XRPL were indeed a dormant "zombie chain." Emir Yavuz, who handles community engagement at Ultra Stellar, defended Stellar, emphasizing the project's recent strides in tokenization, including WisdomTree's $365 million in tokenized assets.
Partial Concurrence from Crypto Insiders
While some within the cryptocurrency community have vehemently rejected Forbes' findings, others have acknowledged the validity of certain observations. Renowned independent journalist Laura Shin praised the article for shedding light on the issue of "crypto zombies," describing it as an "excellent story."
Forbes' Critical Metrics
Forbes' analysis heavily relied on the following metrics to assess the viability of the targeted blockchain networks:
- Ratio of Market Cap to Fees: This metric compares the market capitalization of a project to the fees it generates. Projects with high ratios may indicate speculative hype rather than meaningful usage.
- Fundraising and Hodling of Funds: Forbes highlighted the tendency of "crypto zombies" to raise substantial funds for future expansion, potentially resembling securities offerings that fall under the SEC's Howey test. The article further criticized the hoarding of funds by projects such as Ripple, which holds a significant treasury of XRP tokens.
Conclusion
Forbes' "crypto zombies" article has undoubtedly sparked a heated debate within the cryptocurrency industry. While some have vehemently refuted the allegations, others have acknowledged the need for increased focus on project viability and real-world applications. The article has also raised questions about the fundraising practices of certain blockchain networks and the potential implications under securities regulations.
As the cryptocurrency sector continues to evolve, the issue of "crypto zombies" is likely to remain a topic of discussion. The industry must grapple with the challenge of distinguishing between projects that offer genuine value and those that rely solely on speculation. This scrutiny will ultimately benefit the sector by fostering innovation and weeding out unsustainable projects, paving the way for a more robust and thriving ecosystem.
Clause de non-responsabilité:info@kdj.com
Les informations fournies ne constituent pas des conseils commerciaux. kdj.com n’assume aucune responsabilité pour les investissements effectués sur la base des informations fournies dans cet article. Les crypto-monnaies sont très volatiles et il est fortement recommandé d’investir avec prudence après une recherche approfondie!
Si vous pensez que le contenu utilisé sur ce site Web porte atteinte à vos droits d’auteur, veuillez nous contacter immédiatement (info@kdj.com) et nous le supprimerons dans les plus brefs délais.
-
- Le jeu de garde de la Deutsche Bank Bitcoin: A New York Minute on Crypto Services
- Jul 01, 2025 at 10:30 pm
- La Deutsche Bank saute en garde à vue, signalant une acceptation institutionnelle croissante. En partenariat avec Bitpanda et Taurus, ils sont prêts à secouer les services de cryptographie en 2026.
-
-
- Altcoins en juin 2025: données, tendances et quelle est la prochaine étape pour la crypto
- Jul 01, 2025 at 09:30 pm
- Juin 2025 a vu un mélange de chaos et d'opportunités à Altcoins. Découvrez les tendances clés du marché, l'activité des baleines et les étoiles potentielles dans l'espace cryptographique.
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Le prix du bitcoin en espèces atteint un sommet de 8 mois: est-ce que 1700 $?
- Jul 01, 2025 at 08:35 pm
- Bitcoin Cash (BCH) fait des vagues, atteignant un haut de 8 mois! Alimenté par des modèles haussiers et des intérêts communautaires, BCH peut-il atteindre 1 700 $? Découvrez ce qui stimule cette augmentation.