福布斯的“僵尸”加密货币分类引发了关于效用和投机的争论

Cryptocurrency Market Roiled by 'Zombie' Classification, Sparking Debate on Utility and Speculation

A recent investigation by Forbes has ignited a heated debate within the cryptocurrency ecosystem, labeling several prominent platforms as "zombies" due to alleged low user engagement. Among the platforms so designated are Cardano, Tezos, Litecoin, Algorand, Monero, Ripple, and others.

Forbes' Classification and Criticism

The Forbes article, published on March 27, 2024, identifies approximately 50 cryptocurrencies currently trading at valuations exceeding $1 billion, with at least 20 classified as "functional zombies." The report lambasts these blockchains as having "little utility" beyond speculative trading, despite accumulating substantial treasuries and remaining unaccountable to shareholders or regulators.

Cardano under Scrutiny

Cardano, in particular, became a focal point of criticism. The article notes that despite generating $3 million in fees over the past year, the Cardano Foundation acknowledges that it has yet to complete its development stages. Forbes also raises questions regarding Charles Hoskinson, Cardano's visionary founder, detailing his investments in a Wyoming ranch, alien hunting expeditions, and a center for regenerative and anti-aging medicine.

Hoskinson's Witty Response

Undeterred, Charles Hoskinson responded with a tongue-in-cheek tweet, sharing an animated clip from the popular television series "South Park" featuring a horde of zombies. The caption accompanying the tweet, which included references to Bitcoin Cash, Stellar, and Ethereum Classic, suggests that these "zombies" are, in fact, "all brains," a veiled dig at Forbes' characterization.

Hoskinson's Tweet:

"Hey guys @tezos @Algorand @bitcoincasorg @Ripple_XRP1 @StellarOrg @BobSummerwill, we are all Crypto Zombies according to Forbes. I guess it's because we got all the 🧠! pic.twitter.com/nwKbf7R4Pb"

Debate on Speculation vs. Utility

The "zombie" classification has reignited a long-standing debate within the cryptocurrency market. Critics argue that many platforms, including those deemed "functional zombies," are primarily driven by speculative trading rather than genuine utility. Advocates, on the other hand, maintain that these platforms have the potential to revolutionize various industries, such as finance, supply chain management, and healthcare.

Resilience of Cryptocurrency Market

Hoskinson's witty response to Forbes' criticism underscores the resilience of the cryptocurrency market, where developers and advocates remain steadfast in their belief in the transformative potential of these technologies. The debate surrounding "zombie" coins highlights the ongoing tension between speculation and innovation within the ecosystem.

Historical Parallel to Bitcoin Criticism

The controversy surrounding "zombie" cryptocurrencies bears striking similarities to the frequent declarations of Bitcoin's demise. Since 2010, Bitcoin has been pronounced "dead" 476 times, a testament to the volatility and resilience of the cryptocurrency market.

Conclusion

The "zombie" classification of certain cryptocurrencies has sparked a heated debate on the utility and speculative nature of these technologies. While critics question the value of platforms with low user engagement, advocates remain optimistic about their potential for innovation. The controversy highlights the ongoing evolution and maturation of the cryptocurrency market, where the search for true value and innovation continues to drive passionate discussions among both supporters and detractors.