龍捲風現金試用：隱私工具還是洗錢機？

隨著羅馬風暴面臨審判，龍捲風現金傳奇仍在繼續。它是濫用隱私工具還是設計通過設計的洗錢機？

Tornado Cash on Trial: Privacy Tool or Money Laundering Machine?

龍捲風現金試用：隱私工具還是洗錢機？

The crypto world is watching closely as the trial of Roman Storm, co-founder of Tornado Cash, unfolds in Manhattan. The central question: is Tornado Cash a privacy tool that was unfortunately exploited, or was it inherently designed to facilitate money laundering? Let's dive in.

當曼哈頓龍捲風現金的聯合創始人羅馬風暴的審判羅馬風暴的審判中，加密世界正在密切關注。中心問題：不幸的是，龍捲風現金是一種隱私工具，還是固有地旨在促進洗錢？讓我們潛水。

The Core Debate: Intent vs. Misuse

核心辯論：意圖與濫用

The prosecution argues that Storm knowingly created a tool that laundered dirty money, pointing to his alleged awareness of criminal activity on the platform. They even brought up a photo of Storm wearing a Tornado Cash-branded washing machine t-shirt as evidence of his intent. They also claim that Storm ignored victims of scams who reached out for help, further cementing the idea that he knew what was happening and didn't care.

檢察官認為，風暴有意創造了一種洗錢的工具，指出他據稱在平台上對犯罪活動的認識。他們甚至提出了一張穿著龍捲風現金品牌洗衣機T恤的風暴的照片，以證明他的意圖。他們還聲稱，風暴忽略了騙局的受害者，他們伸出援手尋求幫助，進一步鞏固了他知道發生了什麼而不在乎的想法。

The defense paints a different picture. They claim Storm aimed to create a privacy tool, inspired by Ethereum's Vitalik Buterin. They argue that criminals misused Tornado Cash, but this doesn't make Storm criminally liable. They compare it to a smartphone used for scams or a hammer used for burglaries, highlighting that a tool's potential for misuse doesn't negate its legitimate purpose.

防禦繪製了不同的圖片。他們聲稱風暴旨在創建一個受到以太坊的維塔利克·布特林（Vitalik Buterin）啟發的隱私工具。他們認為犯罪分子濫用了龍捲風現金，但這並不使風暴犯罪。他們將其與用於騙局的智能手機或用於盜竊案的錘子進行了比較，強調了工具的濫用潛力並不能否定其合法目的。

The Telegram Message Controversy

電報消息爭議

Adding fuel to the fire, a key piece of evidence – a Telegram message referencing the $600 million Axie Infinity exploit – was initially misattributed by prosecutors to Storm's co-developer, Alexey Pertsev. It turned out the message was written by a CoinDesk reporter and forwarded by Pertsev. This blunder raised serious questions about the prosecution's handling of evidence and the potential for false information influencing the case.

最初，檢察官誤導了風暴的共同發展者Alexey Pertsev，在大火中添加燃料 - 引用了6億Axie Infinity Exploit的電報消息。事實證明，該消息是由Coindesk記者撰寫的，並由Pertsev轉發。這一錯誤提出了有關檢方處理證據的嚴重問題，以及影響此案的虛假信息的潛力。

Privacy vs. Anonymity: A Crucial Distinction

隱私與匿名性：至關重要的區別

The defense emphasizes the importance of privacy in the crypto space. With the blockchain being public and easily searchable, privacy tools like Tornado Cash can offer a layer of protection. As Storm's lawyer put it, "How would you feel if someone took your bank account and published it on the internet?" This argument highlights the legitimate need for privacy in a world where financial transactions are increasingly transparent.

辯方強調隱私在加密貨幣領域的重要性。由於區塊鍊是公開且易於搜索的，龍捲風現金等隱私工具可以提供一層保護。正如Storm的律師所說，“如果有人拿走您的銀行帳戶並將其發佈在互聯網上，您會感覺如何？”在金融交易越來越透明的世界中，這一論點強調了對隱私的合法需求。

The Stakes Are High

賭注很高

This case has significant implications for open-source software development. The Ethereum Foundation has pledged substantial financial support to Storm's defense, underscoring the concern that a conviction could set a dangerous precedent, criminalizing the creation of software that can be misused by bad actors.

這種情況對開源軟件開發具有重要意義。以太坊基金會已承諾為風暴的辯護提供大量的財政支持，並強調了信念可能樹立危險先例的擔憂，將可能被不良行為者濫用的軟件定為犯罪。

My Two Satoshis

我的兩個satoshis

It seems to me that there needs to be a clearer distinction between creating a tool and actively participating in illegal activities. While Tornado Cash was undoubtedly used for nefarious purposes, proving that Storm intended it to be a money laundering machine is a high bar. The misattribution of the Telegram message certainly doesn't help the prosecution's case.

在我看來，在創建工具和積極參與非法活動之間需要更明顯的區別。雖然無疑是用於邪惡目的的龍捲風現金，但證明風暴打算是洗錢機是一個高級酒吧。電報消息的錯誤歸類無疑不能幫助起訴案件。

The Verdict? TBD

判決？ TBD

The trial is ongoing, and the jury will ultimately decide Storm's fate. But one thing is clear: the Tornado Cash saga has sparked a crucial conversation about privacy, anonymity, and the responsibility of software developers in the crypto age. It's a complex issue with no easy answers, but one thing's for sure, it's not going to be boring. Stay tuned, crypto fam!

審判正在進行，陪審團最終將決定風暴的命運。但是有一件事很明顯：龍捲風現金傳奇引發了有關隱私，匿名性和軟件開發人員在加密時代的責任的關鍵對話。這是一個複雜的問題，沒有簡單的答案，但是可以肯定的是，這不會很無聊。敬請期待，加密貨幣。